Masaki Kato ¹, Masaki Yamashita ¹, Shigeki Kojima ², Mitsuto Tsukui ¹, Yoshihiko Iijima ¹, Kenichi Araki ¹, Jun Ishida ¹, Takumi Komatsu ¹, Yusuke Nakamoto ¹, Akiyo Kawashima ¹, Maki Konno ¹, Hirofumi Kiyokawa ¹, Yoshinori Sato ¹, Tsutomu Sakurada ², Tadateru Maehata ¹, Hiroshi Yasuda ¹, Keisuke Tateishi ¹

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43389. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043389.

5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) intolerance complicates ulcerative colitis (UC) management, often necessitating alternative treatment approaches. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) has been recognized as a safe treatment option for patients with UC who are refractory or intolerant to conventional drugs, including steroids; however, its effectiveness and safety in patients with 5-ASA intolerance remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. Eighty-five patients with UC who underwent GMA were assessed, including 21 with 5-ASA intolerance and 64 with 5-ASA tolerance. This study compared the patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, concomitant drugs, and adverse events between the 2 groups. The remission rate was 28.6% (6/21) in the 5-ASA-intolerant group and 31.3% (20/64) in the 5-ASA-tolerant group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .967). Both groups showed significant reductions in the dose of oral prednisolone and Lichtiger clinical activity index scores following the GMA. Our study suggests that GMA is equally effective and safe in 5-ASA-intolerant and 5-ASA-tolerant patients, offering an alternative treatment option in this challenging clinical scenario.

Yukari Okubo ¹, Ryuhei Okuyama ², Shinichi Imafuku ³, Yayoi Tada ⁴, Keiichi Yamanaka ⁵, Kazumitsu Sugiura ⁶, Yukie Yamaguchi ⁷, Masahito Yasuda ⁸, Wataru Sakamoto ⁹, Morihisa Saitoh ⁹, Akimichi Morita ¹⁰; Study Investigators

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). . 2025 Jul;15(7):1883-1899. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01429-8. Epub 2025 May 19.

Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe, and chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread pustules that leads to unpredictable and potentially serious disease flares. Information regarding treatment status for GPP and treatment patterns for flares is important but limited as a result of the rarity of the condition. We conducted a 10-year, retrospective, longitudinal chart review of treatment patterns at GPP referral hospitals in Japan.

Methods: Eligible patients with GPP had at least 6 months of continuous observation data within 10 years after the date of protocol approval. Data were collected from patient records and annual patient reports. Patient characteristics and treatment details, including in relation to flare occurrence, were analyzed.

Results: The median age of patients (N = 205) was 53 years; 48.3% were female and most had mild or moderate GPP (66.8%). Patients commonly received nonbiologic systemic therapy (86.3%) and a similar proportion received biologics (79.5%); 95.1% received topical treatment and 22.4% received systemic adrenal corticosteroids. Use of nonbiologic systemic therapy decreased, and use of biologics increased, over the study period. During the observation period, the proportion of patients receiving biologic therapy increased after a flare (from 41.4% receiving biologics when flares occurred to 62.9% initiating a new biologic post flare).

Conclusion: In Japanese clinical practice, the evolution of treatment practices for GPP has seen an increased use of biologic therapies over time. Biologic use was common after flares; however, some flares occurred during biologic therapy, indicating a need for improved treatment options to maintain stable disease and prevent flares.

Namiko Abe ¹, Yuko Higashi ², Chiharu Tateishi ³, Takuro Kanekura ², Daisuke Tsuruta ³, Tomoko Kobayashi ¹, Yukari Okubo ¹

J Dermatol. 2025 Apr;52(4):642-650. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17667. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated granulocytes and monocytes from the peripheral blood. In 2012, GMA was approved in Japan as a treatment for generalized pustular psoriasis and localized pustular psoriasis or palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). Limited evidence from case reports and monocentric studies suggested that GMA is an effective treatment for skin and joint symptoms of PPP with pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO). The present, prospective, observational study was performed at three dermatology departments in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GMA in patients with PPP with PAO. Between April 2017 and December 2020, two male and 12 female patients with PPP and PAO were enrolled. Their mean age, mean duration of skin manifestations, and mean duration of PAO symptoms was 52.8 years, 51.2 months, and 44.9 months, respectively. GMA was applied weekly over five sessions. The skin and joint symptoms were assessed at baseline, post-GMA, and at the 3-month follow-up. A total of 12 patients completed five GMA sessions, and two patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events. Thus, 12 patients were finally assessed post-GMA, and 10 patients were assessed at the 3-month follow-up. The assessment of GMA efficacy demonstrated that the skin symptoms had remarkably improved and improved in 33.3% (4/12) and 70% (7/10) of the patients post-GMA and at the 3-month follow-up, respectively. Furthermore, the joint symptoms had remarkably improved in 66.7% (8/12) and 60% (6/10) of the patients post-GMA and at the 3-month follow-up, respectively. These results suggest that GMA is effective in treating the skin and joint symptoms of PPP with PAO.

M Hupé , G Bouguen , A Buisson , C Landman , M Uzzan , S Nancey , C Guillaume , G Cyrielle , M Charkaoui , M Serrero , A Wampach , M Collins , R Altwegg , F Cholet , A Amiot

Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 19, Issue Supplement_1, January 2025, Page i1338, https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0858

Background: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with ADACOLUMN® (JIMRO Takasaki Japan) is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with mild to moderate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refractory to pharmacological therapy, especially ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to report effectiveness of GMA in patients with IBD.

Methods: All consecutive active, non-operated UC patients and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients treated with GMA in 15 French tertiary-care centres from 2007 to september 2024 were assessed. Patients received 4 to 8 weekly sessions of GMA alone or in combination with previously failing advanced therapy. Patients were assessed for effectiveness at week 14 and at week 54 for those continuing GMA as maintenance therapy and at every visit for safety. Clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, colectomy as well as safety were ascertained.

Results: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with IBD (75 males, median age: 40.9 IQR[29.3-58.1] years, 102 with UC, IBD duration: 7.0 [2.9-13.1] years) were included. One hundred patients (77.5%) were previously treated with immunosuppressants and 97 (72.2%) with at least one anti-TNF. In patients with UC, baseline median total Mayo score was 7 [6-12] and mean CRP level was 23.3 ± 86.0 mg/L. In patients with CD, baseline median Harvey-Bradshaw index was 9 [7.25-10.75] and mean CRP level was 21.9 ± 27.3 mg/L. In patients with UC, week 14 clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and response rates were 33.3%, 27.5% and 52.0%, respectively. In patients with CD, week 14 clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and response rates were 33.3%, 29.6% and 66.7%, respectively. At week 14, nine patients with UC and 3 patients with CD required emergent surgery. At week 14, adverse events were reported in 26 (20.2%) and were mainly related to flare of IBD in 16 (12.4%). Other adverse events which were never classified as serious included headache in 3, arthromyalgia in 3 and abdominal pain, diarrhea, grade-1 increase in liver enzymes and mild hypotension in one. At week 54, 48 patients were still treated with maintenance GMA therapy including 13 with CD and 35 with UC. At week 54, steroid-free clinical remission rates were 38.5% (5/13) in patients with CD and 60% (21/35) in patients with UC.

Conclusion: In this real world cohort of patients with refractory IBD, GMA induced steroid-free clinical remission in one third of patients with CD and UC at W14. In patients continuing GMA maintenance therapy, steroid-free clinical remission was observed in one third of patients with CD and two thirds of patients with UC. Safety profile was favourable mostly related to relapse of IBD.

Francisco José Fernández-Pérez ¹, Nuria Fernández-Moreno ², Estela Soria-López ², Francisco Javier Rodriguez-González ², Francisco José Fernández-Galeote ³, Ana Lifante-Oliva ⁴, Concepción Ruíz-Hernández ⁴, Elisabeth Escalante-Quijaite ⁴, Francisco Rivas-Ruiz ⁵

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Nov;47(9):502196. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502196. Epub 2024 May 6. (Article in Spanish)

Introduction: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) removes neutrophils and monocytes from peripheral blood, preventing their incorporation into the inflamed tissue also influencing cytokine balance. Published therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more consistent than in Crohn’s disease (CD). We assessed clinical efficacy of GMA in UC and CD 4 weeks after last induction session, at 3 and 12 months, sustained remission and corticosteroid-free remission.

Patients and method: Retrospective observational study of UC and CD patients treated with GMA. Partial Disease Activity Index-DAIp in UC and Harvey-Bradshaw Index-HBI in CD assessed efficacy of Adacolumn® with induction and optional maintenance sessions.

Results: We treated 87 patients (CD-25, UC-62), 87.3% corticosteroid-dependent (CSD), 42.5% refractory/intolerant to immunomodulators. In UC, remission and response were 32.2% and 19.3% after induction, 35.5% and 6.5% at 12 weeks and 29% and 6.5% at 52 weeks. In CD, remission rates were 60%, 52% and 40% respectively. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients (UC-41, CD-14), 68.3% of UC achieved remission or response after induction, 51.2% at 12 weeks and 46.3% at 52 weeks, and 62.3%, 64.3% and 42.9% in CD. Maintained remission was achieved by 66.6% in CD and 53.1% in UC. Up to 74.5% of patients required corticosteroids at some timepoint. Corticosteroid-free response/remission was 17.7% in UC and 24% in CD.

Conclusions: GMA is a good therapeutic tool for both in UC and CD patients. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients it avoids biological therapy or surgery in up to 40% of them in one year.

Ryo Hisamune ¹, Kazuma Yamakawa ¹, Katsuhide Kayano ¹, Noritaka Ushio ¹, Takeshi Wada ², Kohei Taniguchi ³, Akira Takasu ¹ Acute Med Surg. . 2024 Aug 29;11(1):e70003. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70003. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Aims: SARS-CoV-2 causes systemic immune dysfunction, leading to severe respiratory dysfunction and multiorgan dysfunction. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) therapy is designed to regulate an excessive inflammatory response and has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to investigate a targeted subset of granulocytes and monocytes to be removed after GMA therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 infection.

Methods: We established an ex vivo experimental system to study the effects of GMA. Blood samples were collected into EDTA-treated tubes and a mixture of blood samples and cellulose acetate beads was used in GMA. After GMA, blood samples were removed, and the granulocyte and monocyte subtypes before and after GMA were determined by CyTOF mass cytometry. To analyze mass cytometry data with a self-organizing map, hierarchical clustering was used to determine the appropriate number of metaclusters from t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding.

Results: We included seven patients with severe COVID-19 and four age- and sex-matched volunteers. Granulocyte subsets removed by GMA strongly expressed CD11b, CD16, and CD66b, and weakly expressed CD11c, consistent with mature and activated neutrophils. Monocyte subsets strongly expressed CD14, weakly expressed CD33 and CD45RO, and did not express CD16. These subsets were indicated to promote the release of inflammatory cytokines and activate T cells.

Conclusions: The identification of the granulocyte and monocyte subsets removed after GMA in patients with severe COVID-19 may help explain the potential mechanism underlying the effectiveness of GMA in COVID-19 and other inflammatory diseases.

I Rodríguez-Lago, D Ginard, R J Díaz Molina, M Vicuña, E Domenech, M Abanades, O Moralejo Lozano, G Bastida, A D Sánchez Capilla, E Iglesias, F Rancel-Medina, M D M Blasco, M Bosca-Watts, M Calvo Iñiguez, C Herrera deGuisé, E Leo, A Viejo Almanzor, V Hernández Ramirez, C Suárez Ferrer, L Quilez Pérez, M Muñoz, F Fernández Pérez, J M Huguet, P Fradejas, C López Ramos, A M Fuentes Coronel, C Reygosa Castro, N Rull Murillo, P Zapico, J L Cabriada
Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i1011, doi.org=10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0641

Background
The clinical efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with Adacolumn in patients (pts) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been reported in several clinical trials (CT), with significant clinical remission rates. However, evidence on real-world effectiveness of GMA with Adacolumn in ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) patients who were underrepresented in CT is still limited.

Methods
GRACE is a multicentric, prospective observational study conducted at 31 centres in Spain. The study included adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with UC or CD who had been scheduled to receive GMA with Adacolumn in clinical practice. The study consisted of a baseline (GMA initiation) and 3 follow-up visits at 4, 24, and 48 weeks after the last GMA session. The primary endpoint is the steroid-free remission rate at 24 weeks. This interim analysis is focused on clinical characterization of patients and their management and outcome 4 weeks after GMA treatment.

Results
A total of 95 evaluable patients were included at data cut-off date (25 Sept 2023) (median age: 54 years; 50% men: 81% outpatients). Overall, 89.4% (n=84) of patients had UC, being moderate-to-severe in 85.5%; 57,8% had pancolitis, and the median Mayo score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-6). Out of the 10 patients (10.6%) with CD, all had B1, and 3 patients had L1, 4 L2 and 3 L3. Overall, 17% had extraintestinal manifestations. Regarding IBD-related therapy, 52.6% of patients had previously received anti-TNF agents, 37.9% thiopurines, and 17.8% JAK inhibitors. Overall, 85.3% of patients received concomitant treatment with GMA, most commonly 5-ASA (60%), corticosteroids (51,6%), ustekinumab (20%), vedolizumab (17.9%), and anti-TNF therapy (11.6%). A total of 71 patients reached the 4-week visit after receiving a median of 10 (IQR, 8-10) GMA sessions (weekly: 26.3%, biweekly: 36.8%, and weekly/biweekly: 31.6%). At week 4, clinical remission was achieved by 50.7% of patients (UC: 49.2%; CD: 66.7%), being 50% and 53.3% in patients concomitantly treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Steroid-free remission rate was 26.1% (UC: 22.2%; CD: 66.7%) at week 4. Overall, 11,2% of patients experienced AEs related to GMA, most of them being mild (73%) or moderate (22.4%). Most common AEs were headache and asthenia. No SAEs were observed.

Conclusion
Preliminary data at 4 weeks show that Adacolumn is a safe and effective treatment in a cohort of IBD refractory patients with previous failure to multiple therapies including thiopurines, biologics and JAK inhibitors. Half of patients were concomitantly treated with biologics, and their clinical remission rate was similar to the overall population. Long-term results of this study (48 weeks) are required to confirm these findings.

F Kenta, S Kensuke, T Shun, W Ryosuke, N Yusuke, Y Ren, S Kentaro, S Itsuki, O Hisashi, M Takuto
Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i1807, doi.org=10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1126

Background
Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorption Apheresis (GMA) is one of the valuable non-immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, due to the limited number of facilities where GMA can be performed, there are few reports on the combined effects of GMA and prednisolone (PSL), the frequency of GMA implementation or predictive factors for the effectiveness. In this study, we examined the combined effect of GMA and PSL as a remission induction therapy, the frequency of GMA and predictive factors.

Methods
A retrospective observational study was conducted at Kushiro Rosai Hospital. We analyzed clinical data from UC patients who underwent GMA from February 2015 to May 2023.

Results
The study included 54 patients (30 males and 24 females), with a median age of 48 years and a median disease duration of 2 years. The median Lichtiger-CAI (L-CAI) was 8. There were 43 patients of pancolitis. There were 51 biologics-naïve patients and 3 biologics-experienced patients. Concomitant medications included 5-ASA agents in 21 patients, immunomodulators in 7 patients, and PSL in 31 patients. The median CRP was 1.19 mg/dl and the median albumin was 3.5 g/dl. Adverse events were observed in 3 patients (fatigue, dizziness, palpitations). The median number of GMA sessions was 10, with 33 patients undergoing twice weekly and 9 patients three times weekly. The clinical remission rate was 80% (43/54), and the clinical response rate was 89% (48/54), with a significant improvement in the median L-CAI from 8 to 3 before and after GMA (P<0.001). In the comparison between the PSL concomitant group and the non-PSL group, the clinical remission rate was 83.9% (26/31) in PSL group and 73.9% (17/23) in non-PSLgroup (P=0.369). The clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PSL group (87% (27/31)) than in non-PSL group (52.2% (12/23)) (P=0.004). There was no significant difference in the clinical remission/response rate between the group that underwent GMA twice a week (76.9% (30/39)/84.6% (33/39)) and three times a week (77.8% (7/9)/77.8% (7/9)). In univariate analysis, biologics-naïve was extracted as a contributing factor to clinical remission. The cumulative remission rate at 52 weeks was 72% overall. There was no significant difference in the cumulative remission rate between the PSL group (76.8%) and the non-PSL group (67.6%) (P=0.524). There was also no significant difference between the twice-weekly group (75%) and the three-times-weekly group (57.1%) (P=0.236). Conclusion GMA for UC was found to be useful and safely performed as a remission induction therapy. Concomitant use of PSL increased the clinical response rate. The frequency of GMA showed that three times per week was as effective as two times per week.

I Rodríguez-Lago, C Herrera-deGuise, M Boscá-Watts, C Rodríguez, E Leo, M Calvo, F Cañete, S Chacón, C Cuarán, A Elorza, E Guerra, E Iglesias, D Sánchez, M Barreiro-de Acosta, D Ginard, J L Cabriada Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i1135, doi.org=10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0712

Background
Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports have also described its combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF.

Methods
The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentric study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined GMA plus UST. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and time of each session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing the GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding UST intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and surgery were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

Results
Nineteen patients were included (15 UC, 2 Crohn’s disease, 2 unclassified IBD; median age 48 years (IQR, 36-63); 68% male). At baseline, 78% were receiving steroids and 23% immunomodulators. Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab. Baseline Mayo score was 6.5 (IQR, 5-7), with a median CRP of 9 mg/L (IQR, 4.8-20.8) and faecal calprotectin 1,612 mg/kg (IQR, 873-4,152). GMA was started mostly after PNR in 83%, the median number of GMA sessions was 16 (IQR, 11-27) and 50% of patients started maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 6 months after the last GMA session (p=0.019). During follow-up, 27% started a new biologic therapy and 13% required surgery. 64% of patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. Adverse events were reported in 5% of patients.

Conclusion
GMA can safely recapture the response to UST in refractory patients after PNR or LOR to this drug.

Iago Rodríguez-Lago 1, Fiorella Cañete 2, Elena Guerra-Del-Río 3, Claudia Herrera-deGuise 4, Eva Iglesias 5, Eduardo Leo 6, Yamile Zabana 7, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta 8, Daniel Ginard 9, José Luis Cabriada 10
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan 23:S0210-5705(24)00022-0. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.004. Online ahead of print.
[Article in English, Spanish]

Objective: Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC.

Patients and methods: Retrospective study including all patients with refractory UC who received GMA plus TOFA. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

Results: Twelve patients were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3). Patients were mostly receiving TOFA 10mg bid (75%), and 33% also concomitant steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 7 (IQR, 5-7), and it decreased to a median of 2 (IQR, 0-3) and 0 (IQR, 0-3) after 1 and 6 months (p=0.027 and 0.020, respectively), while no differences were found in CRP and FC. Clinical remission was achieved by 6 patients both at 1 (50%) and 6 months (67%). CF values<250mg/kg were achieved by 2 and 4 patients at 1 and 6 months (data available in 5 and 7 patients, respectively). No patient required dose-escalation of TOFA, and one patient was able to de-escalate the drug. No patient required colectomy and all patients under steroids were able to stop them. Conclusion: The combination of GMA and TOFA can be effective in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug