Vaios Svolos, Hannah Gordon 1, Miranda C E Lomer 2, Marina Aloi 3 4, Aaron Bancil 5, Alice S Day 6, Andrew S Day 7, Jessica A Fitzpatrick 8, Konstantinos Gerasimidis 9, Konstantinos Gkikas 9, Lihi Godny 10, Charlotte R H Hedin 11 12, Konstantinos Katsanos 13, Neeraj Narula 14, Richard K Russell 15, Chen Sarbagili-Shabat 16 17, Jonathan P Segal 18 19, Rotem Sigall-Boneh 20 21, Harry Sokol 22, Catherine L Wall 23, Kevin Whelan 2, Eytan Wine 24, Henit Yanai 25 26, Richard Hansen, Emma P Halmos 27
Tag: IBD
Scientific corner
ECCO Consensus on Dietary Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
J Crohns Colitis. 2025 Jul 12:jjaf122. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf122. Online ahead of print.
curcumin & qing dai statements: 16.1, 16.2, 16.3
Scientific corner
GETECCU position paper on fragility, advanced age and inflammatory bowel disease.
Documento de posicionamiento de geteccu sobre fragilidad, edad avanzada y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal
Míriam Mañosa a, Margalida Calafat a, Esther Francia b, Francesc Riba c, Francisco Mesonero d, Cristina Suárez e, Santiago García-López f, Francisco Losfablos g, Xavier Calvet hi, Eugeni Domènech ai, Ana Gutiérrez Casbas j, Ingrid Ordás k, Luis Menchén l, Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta m, Yamile Zabana n
Gastroenterología y Hepatología, 2025, 502529, ISSN 0210-5705, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502529.
Resumen
La fragilidad es un estado de vulnerabilidad caracterizado por una disminución de la reserva fisiológica y la capacidad de respuesta ante el estrés, lo que aumenta el riesgo de complicaciones, efectos adversos a los tratamientos y al deterioro funcional. La valoración de la fragilidad permite determinar la edad biológica de los pacientes, más allá de su edad cronológica, proporcionando una visión más precisa de su estado de salud y necesidades asistenciales. La proporción de adultos de edad avanzada con EII se halla en aumento de forma paralela al envejecimiento de la población general y se estima que, en la próxima década, más de un tercio de los pacientes con EII superarán los 60 años. Esta población puede sufrir las complicaciones derivadas de la propia EII desarrolladas previamente a la vez que es particularmente susceptible a desarrollar efectos secundarios del tratamiento, lo que hace imprescindible su evaluación integral con el fin de identificar aquellos más vulnerables. A la fragilidad se unen otros síndromes geriátricos como la comorbilidad y la polifarmacia que pueden interferir de forma notable con el manejo y el curso de la EII, condicionando la estrategia terapéutica y el pronóstico.
Objetivo
En este contexto, la evaluación geriátrica integral debe ser sistemática en los pacientes de edad avanzada con EII, con el objetivo de detectar déficits funcionales e implementar intervenciones específicas de apoyo nutricional, rehabilitación funcional y atención psicológica para optimizar su evolución. Este documento de posicionamiento pretende establecer recomendaciones al respecto basadas en la evidencia disponible.
Conclusiones
La incorporación sistemática de la valoración geriátrica integral en el manejo de personas mayores con EII representa una estrategia esencial para mejorar los resultados clínicos, adaptar los tratamientos a la capacidad funcional del paciente y favorecer un enfoque verdaderamente centrado en la persona.
Recomendamos valorar el uso de GMA en los pacientes frágiles o de edad avanzada con EII corticodependientes por su seguridad.
En los pacientes con EII de edad avanzada o en situación de fragilidad, donde el riesgo de efectos adversos por inmunosupresores y corticoides es mayor, la GMA puede representar una opción terapéutica segura. Esta estrategia permite controlar la inflamación sin incrementar significativamente el riesgo de infecciones o neoplasias. Disponemos de datos que han demostrado que la GMA puede inducir remisión clínica en un porcentaje considerable de pacientes mayores con CU moderada o grave, con un perfil de seguridad favorable y sin eventos adversos graves, incluso en presencia de múltiples comorbilidades
Scientific corner
Evolving Trends in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management in Japan: A Decade of Nationwide Data
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40375856/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jgh3.70175
Miki Urushiyama 1, Kunio Tarasawa 2, Rintaro Moroi 1, Hideya Iwaki 1, Yusuke Hoshi 3, Hiroshi Nagai 1, Yusuke Shimoyama 1, Takeo Naito 1, Fumihiko Kakuta 3, Hisashi Shiga 1, Shin Hamada 1, Yoichi Kakuta 1, Kiyohide Fushimi 4, Yoshitaka Kinouchi 1, Daiki Abukawa 3, Kenji Fujimori 2, Atsushi Masamune 1
JGH Open. . 2025 May 14;9(5):e70175. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70175. eCollection 2025 May.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the trends in pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) management in Japan over the past decade.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from Japan’s nationwide database from 2012 to 2022. Patients aged ≤ 15 years diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were included. Trends in the use of biologics, capsule endoscopy, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), elemental diets, surgery, and granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) were examined using the Cochrane-Armitage and Jonckheere-Terpstra trend tests.
Results: Among the 8037 and 6153 pediatric UC and CD admissions, respectively, the use of biologics increased significantly (CD: from 46.0% to 53.6%; UC: from 15.0% to 33.0%, p < 0.0001). The use of capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients with CD increased markedly from 6.6% to 16.7% (p < 0.0001), whereas TPN use decreased from 8.4% to 3.0% (p < 0.0001). Surgery rates for patients with CD remained at approximately 5%, whereas those for patients with UC decreased (from 3.7% to 1.7%, p = 0.002). Elemental diets for pediatric patients with CD increased (from 54.4% to 66.2%, p < 0.0001). The use of GMA decreased significantly in patients with UC (from 12.1% to 2.7%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The use of biologics and capsule endoscopy has increased in pediatric patients with IBD, whereas the use of more invasive treatments has decreased. These trends suggest a shift toward less invasive and more targeted therapeutic strategies in managing pediatric patients with IBD in Japan.
Scientific corner
Therapeutic Leukocytapheresis and Adsorptive Cytapheresis
Elizabeth M. Staley MD, PhD, Huy P. Pham MD, MPH
Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis (Fourth Edition), Elsevier, 2025, chapter 87, Pages 399-401, ISBN 9780323960144, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-96014-4.00049-5.
Leukocytaphersis (or leukapheresis) is a therapeutic procedure in which white blood cells (WBCs) are selectively removed from the patient’s circulation. The procedure is performed for the treatment of hyperleukocytosis most commonly in the setting of leukemia. Adsorptive cytapheresis utilizes apheresis in association with a medical device to selectively extract leukocyte subsets (activated monocytes and granulocytes) from the patient’s circulation. Adsorptive cytapheresis has been utilized for the treatment of multiple inflammatory conditions including inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, Behçet’s disease, and rheumatoid arthritis.
Scientific corner
P0684 Real world experience with granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (ADACOLUMN®) in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective observational multicenter cohort study
M Hupé , G Bouguen , A Buisson , C Landman , M Uzzan , S Nancey , C Guillaume , G Cyrielle , M Charkaoui , M Serrero , A Wampach , M Collins , R Altwegg , F Cholet , A Amiot
Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 19, Issue Supplement_1, January 2025, Page i1338, https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0858
Background: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with ADACOLUMN® (JIMRO Takasaki Japan) is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with mild to moderate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refractory to pharmacological therapy, especially ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to report effectiveness of GMA in patients with IBD.
Methods: All consecutive active, non-operated UC patients and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients treated with GMA in 15 French tertiary-care centres from 2007 to september 2024 were assessed. Patients received 4 to 8 weekly sessions of GMA alone or in combination with previously failing advanced therapy. Patients were assessed for effectiveness at week 14 and at week 54 for those continuing GMA as maintenance therapy and at every visit for safety. Clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, colectomy as well as safety were ascertained.
Results: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with IBD (75 males, median age: 40.9 IQR[29.3-58.1] years, 102 with UC, IBD duration: 7.0 [2.9-13.1] years) were included. One hundred patients (77.5%) were previously treated with immunosuppressants and 97 (72.2%) with at least one anti-TNF. In patients with UC, baseline median total Mayo score was 7 [6-12] and mean CRP level was 23.3 ± 86.0 mg/L. In patients with CD, baseline median Harvey-Bradshaw index was 9 [7.25-10.75] and mean CRP level was 21.9 ± 27.3 mg/L. In patients with UC, week 14 clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and response rates were 33.3%, 27.5% and 52.0%, respectively. In patients with CD, week 14 clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and response rates were 33.3%, 29.6% and 66.7%, respectively. At week 14, nine patients with UC and 3 patients with CD required emergent surgery. At week 14, adverse events were reported in 26 (20.2%) and were mainly related to flare of IBD in 16 (12.4%). Other adverse events which were never classified as serious included headache in 3, arthromyalgia in 3 and abdominal pain, diarrhea, grade-1 increase in liver enzymes and mild hypotension in one. At week 54, 48 patients were still treated with maintenance GMA therapy including 13 with CD and 35 with UC. At week 54, steroid-free clinical remission rates were 38.5% (5/13) in patients with CD and 60% (21/35) in patients with UC.
Conclusion: In this real world cohort of patients with refractory IBD, GMA induced steroid-free clinical remission in one third of patients with CD and UC at W14. In patients continuing GMA maintenance therapy, steroid-free clinical remission was observed in one third of patients with CD and two thirds of patients with UC. Safety profile was favourable mostly related to relapse of IBD.
Scientific corner
Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of granulocyte/monocyte adsorption in rats with drug-induced colitis: Insights from a downsized bead column and newly formed B cells
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39568103/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1744-9987.14234
Yujin Nishioka 1, Goh Murayama 1, Makio Kusaoi 1, Daichi Takemasa 2, Kenta Kaneda 2, Taiga Kuga 1, Yukitomo Hagiwara 1, Takumi Saito 1, Yu Yamaji 1, Yoshifumi Suzuki 3, Tetsutaro Nagaoka 3, Ken Yamaji 1, Naoto Tamura 1
Ther Apher Dial. 2024 Nov 20. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.14234. Online ahead of print.
Introduction: Granulocyte/monocyte adsorption therapy can manage mild-to-moderate inflammatory bowel disease by removing activated granulocytes and monocytes. We evaluated granulocyte/monocyte adsorption using new columns with reduced bead size and theoretically enhanced adsorption.
Methods: We assessed granulocyte/monocyte adsorption in rats with colitis by analyzing cell changes and cytokine production.
Results: Granulocyte/monocyte adsorption with the new columns improved histology in rats with colitis. Contrary to expectations, the adsorption rate of granulocytes/monocytes into the blood did not show a significant improvement. However, flow cytometry showed increased B cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and newly formed B cells in the bone marrow, which produced more interleukin-10 than peripheral blood B cells. Newly formed B cells adoptively transferred into colitis rats accumulated at the inflammation site and tended to inhibit intestinal shortening.
Conclusions: Newly formed B cells with strong interleukin-10 production may alleviate inflammation. The new columns suggest potential for controlling colitis.
Scientific corner
Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A useful therapeutic tool not just in ulcerative colitis but also in Crohn’s disease
Francisco José Fernández-Pérez 1, Nuria Fernández-Moreno 2, Estela Soria-López 2, Francisco Javier Rodriguez-González 2, Francisco José Fernández-Galeote 3, Ana Lifante-Oliva 4, Concepción Ruíz-Hernández 4, Elisabeth Escalante-Quijaite 4, Francisco Rivas-Ruiz 5
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Nov;47(9):502196. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502196. Epub 2024 May 6. (Article in Spanish)
Introduction: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) removes neutrophils and monocytes from peripheral blood, preventing their incorporation into the inflamed tissue also influencing cytokine balance. Published therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more consistent than in Crohn’s disease (CD). We assessed clinical efficacy of GMA in UC and CD 4 weeks after last induction session, at 3 and 12 months, sustained remission and corticosteroid-free remission.
Patients and method: Retrospective observational study of UC and CD patients treated with GMA. Partial Disease Activity Index-DAIp in UC and Harvey-Bradshaw Index-HBI in CD assessed efficacy of Adacolumn® with induction and optional maintenance sessions.
Results: We treated 87 patients (CD-25, UC-62), 87.3% corticosteroid-dependent (CSD), 42.5% refractory/intolerant to immunomodulators. In UC, remission and response were 32.2% and 19.3% after induction, 35.5% and 6.5% at 12 weeks and 29% and 6.5% at 52 weeks. In CD, remission rates were 60%, 52% and 40% respectively. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients (UC-41, CD-14), 68.3% of UC achieved remission or response after induction, 51.2% at 12 weeks and 46.3% at 52 weeks, and 62.3%, 64.3% and 42.9% in CD. Maintained remission was achieved by 66.6% in CD and 53.1% in UC. Up to 74.5% of patients required corticosteroids at some timepoint. Corticosteroid-free response/remission was 17.7% in UC and 24% in CD.
Conclusions: GMA is a good therapeutic tool for both in UC and CD patients. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients it avoids biological therapy or surgery in up to 40% of them in one year.
Scientific corner
Shared Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Psoriasis: Unraveling the Connection
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39364475/
https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/277870/20241003-2188043-2wbb0f.pdf
Walter Jauregui 1, Yozahandy A Abarca 2, Yasmin Ahmadi 3, Vaishnavi B Menon 4, Daniela A Zumárraga 5, Maria Camila Rojas Gomez 6, Aleeza Basri 7, Rohitha S Madala 8, Peter Girgis 9, Zahra Nazir 10
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68569. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Psoriasis (PS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are immune-mediated chronic conditions that share pathophysiological processes, including immune system dysfunction, microbiome dysbiosis, and inflammatory pathways. These pathways result in increased turnover of epithelial cells and compromised barrier function. The assessment of the literature suggests that immunopathogenic mechanisms, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α signaling and IL-23/IL-17 axis dysregulation, are shared by PS and IBD. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic approaches overlap significantly, and advances in biomarker identification benefit both conditions. Current treatments, namely biologics that target TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23, show promising results in decreasing inflammation and controlling symptoms. Precision medicine approaches are prioritized in prospective therapeutic procedures to tailor pharmaceuticals based on specific biomarkers, perhaps improving outcomes and minimizing side effects. This study thoroughly examines and evaluates the body of research on PS and IBD. Several papers were examined to compile data on clinical features, diagnosis, therapies, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and potential future therapeutic developments. The selection of articles was based on three methodological qualities: relevance and addition to the knowledge of IBD and PS. The retrieved data were combined to provide a coherent summary of the state of the knowledge and to spot new trends. The overview of the latest studies demonstrates that both PS and IBD share pathophysiological foundations and therapeutic approaches. With a spotlight on particular biomarkers, advances in precision medicine provide a promising path toward enhancing therapeutic effectiveness and minimizing side effects.
in CD Moderate to severe Oral corticosteroids. Consider enteral nutritional therapy. TNF inhibitors are recommended to be considered for steroid-dependent or refractory patients. If pharmacotherapy or nutrition therapy is ineffective or unable to adapt, the combination with granulocyte monocyte apheresis (GMA) can be considered.
Scientific corner
The role of fecal biomarkers in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38995110/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14737159.2024.2375224
Expert Rev Mol Diagn.. 2024 Jun;24(6):497-508. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2375224. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), is a relapsing and remitting condition. Noninvasive biomarkers have an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of IBD and in the prediction of future disease course in individuals with IBD. Strategies for the management of IBD increasingly rely upon close monitoring of gastrointestinal inflammation.
Areas covered: This review provides an update on the current understanding of established and novel stool-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of IBD. It also highlights key gaps, identifies limitations, and advantages of current markers, and examines aspects that require further study and analysis.
Expert opinion: Current noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in the diagnosis and management of IBD; however, limitations exist. Future work is required to further characterize and validate current and novel markers of inflammation. In addition, it is essential to better understand the roles and characteristics of noninvasive markers to enable the appropriate selection to accurately determine the condition of the intestinal mucosa.
- Noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in diagnosis and management of IBD.
- Fecal inflammatory markers can reflect gut inflammation in IBD; however, they are not specific and various limitations must be considered.
- Although FCal is the most well-established and routinely used marker in IBD, it may have reduced sensitivity and specificity in some settings.
- Several emerging biomarkers including MPO have been assessed and show promise.
- Identification of effective and accurate noninvasive markers of inflammation may limit the need for repeat invasive endoscopic examinations in the future.
Scientific corner
Origin and Function of Monocytes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38764499/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/JIR.S450801#abstract
Xiping Liao # 1 2, Ji Liu # 3, Xiaolong Guo 1, Ruiping Meng 1, Wei Zhang 1, Jianyun Zhou 1, Xia Xie 1 2, Hongli Zhou 1
J Inflamm Res. 2024 May 13:17:2897-2914. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S450801. eCollection 2024.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic disease resulting from the interaction of various factors such as social elements, autoimmunity, genetics, and gut microbiota. Alarmingly, recent epidemiological data points to a surging incidence of IBD, underscoring an urgent imperative: to delineate the intricate mechanisms driving its onset. Such insights are paramount, not only for enhancing our comprehension of IBD pathogenesis but also for refining diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms. Monocytes, significant immune cells derived from the bone marrow, serve as precursors to macrophages (Mφs) and dendritic cells (DCs) in the inflammatory response of IBD. Within the IBD milieu, their role is twofold. On the one hand, monocytes are instrumental in precipitating the disease’s progression. On the other hand, their differentiated offsprings, namely moMφs and moDCs, are conspicuously mobilized at inflammatory foci, manifesting either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory actions. The phenotypic spectrum of these effector cells, intriguingly, is modulated by variables such as host genetics and the subtleties of the prevailing inflammatory microenvironment. Notwithstanding their significance, a palpable dearth exists in the literature concerning the roles and mechanisms of monocytes in IBD pathogenesis. This review endeavors to bridge this knowledge gap. It offers an exhaustive exploration of monocytes’ origin, their developmental trajectory, and their differentiation dynamics during IBD. Furthermore, it delves into the functional ramifications of monocytes and their differentiated progenies throughout IBD’s course. Through this lens, we aspire to furnish novel perspectives into IBD’s etiology and potential therapeutic strategies.
Contact UsFor more information
Contact Us