Eytan Wine, Marina Aloi, Stephanie Van Biervliet, Jiri Bronsky, Javier Martín di Carpi, Marco Gasparetto, Laura Gianolio, Hannah Gordon, Iva Hojsak, Alexandra S. Hudson, Séamus Hussey, Johan van Limbergen, Erasmo Miele, Lorenzo Norsa, Ola Olén, Gianluca Pellino, Patrick van Rheenen, Lissy de Ridder, Richard K. Russell, Dror S. Shouval, Eunice Trindade, Dan Turner, David C. Wilson, Anat Yerushalmy Feler, Amit Assa

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025; 1-51. doi:10.1002/jpn3.70097

Objectives

Despite advances in the management of ambulatory paediatric ulcerative colitis (UC), challenges remain as many patients are refractory to therapy and some require colectomy. The aim of these guidelines is to provide an update on optimal care for UC through detailed recommendations and practice points.

Methods

These guidelines are an update to those published in 2018 and are a joint effort of the Paediatric IBD Porto group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. An extensive literature search with subsequent evidence appraisal using the Oxford methodology was performed, followed by three online voting sessions and a consensus face-to-face meeting. Thirty-nine recommendations and 77 practice points were endorsed by the 25 experts with at least an 84% consensus rate.

Results

Robust evidence-based recommendations and detailed practice points are provided. In addition to reemphasising and updating the role of more ‘traditional’ UC therapies, these guidelines outline optimising the use of antitumour necrosis factor therapies and integrating newer biologics and small molecules, as well as supportive therapy, to improve outcomes and provide an updated management algorithm. Measurement and monitoring tools and decision aids are provided, and additional aspects, including nutritional support, extraintestinal manifestations, pouchitis, inflammatory bowel disease-unclassified and patient support, are discussed. Some aspects, including surgery and thromboprophylaxis, are covered in the acute severe UC guidelines.

GMA has a good safety profile, especially in difficult-to-treat and paediatric settings^. GMA also requires central venous access but may still be considered in children with UC who do not respond or lose response to conventional treatments, but more studies are needed before formal recommendations can be made.

Conclusions

These guidelines serve as an aid in managing children with UC through a combination of evidence-based recommendations and more practical practice points in the ambulatory setting.

Nobuhiro Ueno ^1 2, Yu Kobayashi ³, Aki Sakatani ², Tatsuya Dokoshi ³, Keitaro Takahashi ³, Katsuyoshi Ando ³, Shin Kashima ³, Kentaro Moriichi ³, Hiroki Tanabe ³, Yuki Kamikokura ⁴, Mishie Tanino ⁴, Mikihiro Fujiya ² 

J Clin Apher. 2025 Jun;40(3):e70030. doi: 10.1002/jca.70030.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition requiring lifelong management, with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) agents often used for refractory cases. However, secondary loss of response (LOR) to these agents, due to anti-drug antibodies, poses a significant therapeutic challenge. This report describes a case where granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) maintenance therapy successfully restored the efficacy of an anti-TNF-α agent in a 26-year-old male with active UC experiencing LOR to infliximab. Following GMA induction therapy and continued infliximab administration, clinical symptoms improved, fecal calprotectin levels decreased, and clinical remission was achieved. Long-term maintenance with GMA enabled sustained clinical remission, with mucosal healing observed one year post-therapy. This case suggests that GMA maintenance therapy may serve as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with active UC experiencing LOR to anti-TNF-α agents. However, further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and validate its efficacy.

Satoshi Tanida ^1 2, Naoto Imura ², Shun Sasoh ², Yoshimasa Kubota ², Tesshin Ban ², Tomoaki Ando ², Makoto Nakamura ², Takashi Joh ²

J Clin Med Res  2025 Apr;17(4):240-246. doi: 10.14740/jocmr6188. Epub 2025 Apr 5.

Case 1 involved a 34-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (CD) at 30 years old. After deciding to discontinue CD treatment, she was diagnosed with moderate flare-up of CD based on disease activity and endoscopic findings. Inadequate response was seen 7 days after starting oral prednisolone (PSL) at 30 mg/day, so combination therapy was started with intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) plus upadacitinib (UPA) at 45 mg/day. Twelve weeks after starting this combination therapy, clinical remission and endoscopic and histological improvements of the inflamed mucosa were achieved with no adverse events. Case 2 involved a 26-year-old man who had been diagnosed with CD at 13 years old. He was diagnosed with severe flare-up of CD based on disease activity and endoscopic findings due to loss of response to double doses of infliximab (IFX). Combination therapy was started with intensive GMA plus UPA at 45 mg/day. Twelve weeks after starting this therapy, clinical remission and endoscopic and histological improvements of the inflamed mucosa were achieved with no adverse events. The combination of intensive GMA plus UPA appears to have provided an effective therapeutic option for refractory CD in a patient with a 4-year history of CD and refractoriness to systemic corticosteroids, and in another patient with a 13-year history of CD and loss of response to IFX.

Sneha Annie Sebastian ¹, Oroshay Kaiwan ², Edzel L Co ³, Meghana Mehendale ⁴, Babu P Mohan

Spartan Med Res J. 2024 Sep 9;9(3):123397. doi: 10.51894/001c.123397. eCollection 2024.

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD) with periods of relapse and remission. Current advancements in clinical research have led to the development of more refined and effective medical therapy for UC.

Summary of the evidence: Traditional therapeutic agents such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), sulfasalazine (SASP), corticosteroids, and immunomodulatory drugs have remained the gold standard for decades. However, their novel formulations and dosage regimens have changed their sequences in the medical management of UC. Several other novel drugs are in the final phases of clinical development or have recently received regulatory approval designed to target specific mechanisms involved in the inflammatory cascade for UC.

GMA has shown its efficacy in mild to moderate UC and refractory UC (steroid-dependent UC or biologic/immunologic resistant UC or lost their response to biologics) for remission induction.

Conclusions: This narrative review sought to provide a comprehensive knowledge of the potential benefits of standard and emerging therapies, including novel formulations, new chemical entities, and novel therapeutic approaches in managing UC. Keywords: Ulcerative colitis, 5- Aminosalicylic acid, sulfasalazine, corticosteroids, biologics, immunomodulators, novel formulations.

I Rodríguez-Lago, C Herrera-deGuise, M Boscá-Watts, C Rodríguez, E Leo, M Calvo, F Cañete, S Chacón, C Cuarán, A Elorza, E Guerra, E Iglesias, D Sánchez, M Barreiro-de Acosta, D Ginard, J L Cabriada Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i1135, doi.org=10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0712

Background
Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports have also described its combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF.

Methods
The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentric study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined GMA plus UST. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and time of each session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing the GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding UST intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and surgery were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

Results
Nineteen patients were included (15 UC, 2 Crohn’s disease, 2 unclassified IBD; median age 48 years (IQR, 36-63); 68% male). At baseline, 78% were receiving steroids and 23% immunomodulators. Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab. Baseline Mayo score was 6.5 (IQR, 5-7), with a median CRP of 9 mg/L (IQR, 4.8-20.8) and faecal calprotectin 1,612 mg/kg (IQR, 873-4,152). GMA was started mostly after PNR in 83%, the median number of GMA sessions was 16 (IQR, 11-27) and 50% of patients started maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 6 months after the last GMA session (p=0.019). During follow-up, 27% started a new biologic therapy and 13% required surgery. 64% of patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. Adverse events were reported in 5% of patients.

Conclusion
GMA can safely recapture the response to UST in refractory patients after PNR or LOR to this drug.

Iago Rodríguez-Lago 1, Fiorella Cañete 2, Elena Guerra-Del-Río 3, Claudia Herrera-deGuise 4, Eva Iglesias 5, Eduardo Leo 6, Yamile Zabana 7, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta 8, Daniel Ginard 9, José Luis Cabriada 10
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan 23:S0210-5705(24)00022-0. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.004. Online ahead of print.
[Article in English, Spanish]

Objective: Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC.

Patients and methods: Retrospective study including all patients with refractory UC who received GMA plus TOFA. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

Results: Twelve patients were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3). Patients were mostly receiving TOFA 10mg bid (75%), and 33% also concomitant steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 7 (IQR, 5-7), and it decreased to a median of 2 (IQR, 0-3) and 0 (IQR, 0-3) after 1 and 6 months (p=0.027 and 0.020, respectively), while no differences were found in CRP and FC. Clinical remission was achieved by 6 patients both at 1 (50%) and 6 months (67%). CF values<250mg/kg were achieved by 2 and 4 patients at 1 and 6 months (data available in 5 and 7 patients, respectively). No patient required dose-escalation of TOFA, and one patient was able to de-escalate the drug. No patient required colectomy and all patients under steroids were able to stop them. Conclusion: The combination of GMA and TOFA can be effective in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug

Nobuhiro Ueno Seisuke Saito Masahiro Sato Yuya Sugiyama doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3037827/v1

Background: A remission induction therapy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with Adacolumn was given to patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD). However, establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for GMA in patients with active CD remains unclear. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study encompassed patients with CD who underwent GMA in seven independent institutions in Japan from January 2010 to March 2023. All clinical data were obtained from medical records. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and subsequent clinical progression after GMA in patients with CD. Result: This study enrolled 173 patients with active inflammatory bowel disease who underwent GMA with Adacolumn, and among them, 16 patients with CD with mild to moderate disease activity were analyzed. Concomitant medication, including steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, was used in 93.7% of all cases. The overall remission and response rates were 25.0% and 68.8%, respectively. The response rate between groups concerning the frequency and total GMA sessions revealed no significant difference. Six (37.5%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs). All AEs were related to the trouble in blood access and recovered soon without any sequelae. Regarding the factors associated with response to GMA, the responder group had a significantly longer disease duration (336 vs 44 months, p = 0.036) and exhibited a relatively lower rate of intestinal strictures and a median score of a simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) (9.1 vs 60 %, p = 0.063 and 10 vs 21.5, p = 0.091, respectively). Further, all patients responding to GMA received biologics that were continuously used before and after GMA. Furthermore, 36.4% of patients remained on the same biologics 52 weeks after GMA. Notably, all patients who continued the same biologics had previously experienced a loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agent. Conclusion: Therefore, GMA may exhibit heightened effectiveness in patients with moderately active CD without severe endoscopic activity. Moreover, it represents a potential novel therapeutic option for refractory CD, particularly with insufficient response to biologics.

(PDF) The clinical efficacy and safety of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with Crohn’s disease: A multicenter retrospective cohort study (researchgate.net)

I. Rodríguez-Lago1, F. Cañete2, E. Guerra3, C. Herrera de Guise4, E. Iglesias-Flores5, E. Leo-Carnerero6, Y. Zabana7, M. Barreiro de Acosta8, D. Ginard Vicens9, J.L. Cabriada Nuño1

UEG journal 2023 SUPPLEMENT ABSTRACT UEG Week 2023 Poster Presentations 15 October 2023 page 1067

Introduction: Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports
have also described its combination with biologics.
Aims & Methods: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentre study was performed in 7 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined plus GMA and TOFA. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and length of each
session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding TOFA intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and colectomy were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

Results: Twelve patients with UC were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3; 75% non-smokers). Patients were receiving TOFA10 mg bid (75%), 5 mg bid (16%), or 15 mg bid (8%), with 33% receiving
steroids at baseline. All patients had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents, 42% to vedolizumab and 8% ustekinumab. Median baseline Mayo score was 7 (IQR, 5-7), median CRP of 11 mg/L (IQR, 5-32) and faecal calprotectin 800 mg/kg (IQ, 715-2,094). GMA was started mostly after PNR (73%), and the median number of GMA sessions was 11 (IQR, 3-20) and 50% received maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 1 month after the last GMA session (p=0.027). Four patients (36%) were switched to a new therapy and no patient required colectomy during follow-up. All patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. No patient reported adverse events related to the combination therapy.

Conclusion: Combination of GMA with TOFA can be an effective and safe therapy in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.

Iago Rodríguez-Lago ¹, Leticia Abecia ², Iratxe Seoane ², Juan Anguita ³, José Luis Cabriada ⁴Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul 6:S0210-5705(23)00370-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.07.001.[Article in English, Spanish]

Objective: Primary non-response and secondary loss of response to anti-TNF agents are common in inflammatory bowel disease. Increasing drug concentrations are correlated to better clinical response and remission rates. Combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents could be an option in these patients. The objective of our study was to perform an in vitro assay to determine if the GMA device can lead to infliximab (IFX) adsorption.

Patients and methods: A blood sample was obtained from a healthy control. It was incubated with three concentrations of IFX (3, 6, and 9μg/ml) at room temperature for 10min. At that time, 1ml was collected to determine the IFX concentration. Then, 10ml of each drug concentration was incubated with 5ml of cellulose acetate (CA) beads from the GMA device at 200rpm for 1h at 37°C to simulate physiological human conditions. A second sample of each concentration was collected and IFX levels were determined.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the IFX levels in the blood samples before and after incubation with the CA beads (p=0.41) and after repeated measurements (p=0.31). Mean change was 3.8μg/ml.

Conclusions: The in vitro combination of GMA and IFX did not change the circulating levels of IFX at the three concentrations tested, suggesting that there is no interaction between the drug and the apheresis device in vitro and that they might be safely combined with each other.

An in vitro analysis of the interaction between infliximab and granulocyte-monocyte apheresis – PubMed (nih.gov)

An in vitro analysis of the interaction between infliximab and granulocyte–monocyte apheresis – ScienceDirect