Ludovica Franceschin ¹, Alessia Guidotti ¹, Roberto Mazzetto ¹, Jacopo Tartaglia ¹, Christian Ciolfi ¹, Mauro Alaibac ¹, Alvise Sernicola ¹

Biomolecules. 2024 Nov 27;14(12):1515. doi: 10.3390/biom14121515.

Neutrophil-mediated inflammation is a key feature of immune-mediated chronic skin disorders, but the mechanistic understanding of neutrophil involvement in these conditions remains incomplete. Dapsone, colchicine, and tetracyclines are established drugs within the dermatologist’s therapeutic armamentarium that are credited with potent anti-neutrophilic effects. Anti-neutrophilic drugs have established themselves as versatile agents in the treatment of a wide range of dermatological conditions. Some of these agents are approved for the management of specific dermatologic conditions, but most of their current uses are off-label and only supported by isolated reports or case series. Their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties make them particularly valuable in managing auto-immune bullous diseases, neutrophilic dermatoses, eosinophilic dermatoses, interface dermatitis, and granulomatous diseases that are the focus of this review. By inhibiting inflammatory pathways, reducing cytokine production, and modulating immune responses, they contribute significantly to the treatment and management of these complex skin conditions. Their use continues to evolve as our understanding of these diseases deepens, and they remain a cornerstone of dermatological therapy.

GMA is a promising alternative in patients who have failed conventional therapies for generalized pustular psoriasis, pyoderma gangrenosum, Behçet’s disease, and hidradenitis suppurativa. The strengths of GMA lie in its favorable tolerability and peculiar mode of action that is able to deplete inflammation without causing immunodeficiency.

Yujin Nishioka ¹, Goh Murayama ¹, Makio Kusaoi ¹, Daichi Takemasa ², Kenta Kaneda ², Taiga Kuga ¹, Yukitomo Hagiwara ¹, Takumi Saito ¹, Yu Yamaji ¹, Yoshifumi Suzuki ³, Tetsutaro Nagaoka ³, Ken Yamaji ¹, Naoto Tamura ¹

Ther Apher Dial. 2024 Nov 20. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.14234. Online ahead of print.

Introduction: Granulocyte/monocyte adsorption therapy can manage mild-to-moderate inflammatory bowel disease by removing activated granulocytes and monocytes. We evaluated granulocyte/monocyte adsorption using new columns with reduced bead size and theoretically enhanced adsorption.

Methods: We assessed granulocyte/monocyte adsorption in rats with colitis by analyzing cell changes and cytokine production.

Results: Granulocyte/monocyte adsorption with the new columns improved histology in rats with colitis. Contrary to expectations, the adsorption rate of granulocytes/monocytes into the blood did not show a significant improvement. However, flow cytometry showed increased B cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and newly formed B cells in the bone marrow, which produced more interleukin-10 than peripheral blood B cells. Newly formed B cells adoptively transferred into colitis rats accumulated at the inflammation site and tended to inhibit intestinal shortening.

Conclusions: Newly formed B cells with strong interleukin-10 production may alleviate inflammation. The new columns suggest potential for controlling colitis.

Salma A Rizo-Téllez ¹, János G Filep ¹

Am J Physiol Cell Physiol . 2024 Mar 1;326(3):C661-C683. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00652.2023. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Neutrophils, the most abundant immune cells in human blood, play a fundamental role in host defense against invading pathogens and tissue injury. Neutrophils carry potentially lethal weaponry to the affected site. Inadvertent and perpetual neutrophil activation could lead to nonresolving inflammation and tissue damage, a unifying mechanism of many common diseases. The prevailing view emphasizes the dichotomy of their function, host defense versus tissue damage. However, tissue injury may also persist during neutropenia, which is associated with disease severity and poor outcome. Numerous studies highlight neutrophil phenotypic heterogeneity and functional versatility, indicating that neutrophils play more complex roles than previously thought. Emerging evidence indicates that neutrophils actively orchestrate resolution of inflammation and tissue repair and facilitate return to homeostasis. Thus, neutrophils mobilize multiple mechanisms to limit the inflammatory reaction, assure debris removal, matrix remodeling, cytokine scavenging, macrophage reprogramming, and angiogenesis. In this review, we will summarize the homeostatic and tissue-reparative functions and mechanisms of neutrophils across organs. We will also discuss how the healing power of neutrophils might be harnessed to develop novel resolution and repair-promoting therapies while maintaining their defense functions.

D Kioroglou, J L Cabriada, U Martinez Marigorta, I Rodriguez-Lago. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i389,doi.org=10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0236

Background
Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) is a non-pharmacological treatment approved for the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), particularly steroid-dependent cases. The exact mechanism of action and immunological changes associated with GMA remain undescribed. Gene expression analysis at the single-cell level (through scRNA-Seq) has emerged as a key tool of choice to characterize drug response at the molecular level. We used scRNA-Seq to characterize the transcriptomic effects and immune cell population alterations in GMA.

Methods
We generated scRNA-Seq from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of two ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing GMA treatment. We compared the gene expression profile before and after 5 sessions of GMA treatment. The analytical pipeline included quality control and classical filtering steps, cell-type annotation, differential gene expression analysis and pathway enrichment profiling.

Results
We report three main results. First, we observed significant reductions of cell types directly affected by GMA treatment in UC patients. This includes classical CD14+ monocytes and Natural killers, which are central components of the innate system. Of note, we observed a remarkable increase in Double-negative T cells (dnT) after 5 sessions of GMA treatment, suggesting potential expansion of protective populations involved in decreased inflammation. Second, we observe a variety of genes and regulatory pathways altered by GMA treatment. In total, we detect 86 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which overall are biased towards downregulation (63%). Of note, we detected dnT-s exhibiting upregulation of NEFL that is associated with the MAPK cascade and downregulation of genes related to immune response and signaling pathways. Finally, the effects of GMA treatment extend beyond the above mentioned populations, with particular alterations in CD4+ T cell populations such as CD4+ central memory and CD4+ Naive (7 and 13 DEGs, respectively).

Conclusion
For the first time, we generated single-cell transcriptomic profiles to characterize the effects of GMA treatment in peripheral blood of UC patients. Our preliminary analysis detects important alterations in the gene regulation and cell type composition in samples obtained after 5 sessions of GMA. Through expansion of this dataset to include more time points and profiles for more individuals, we will discuss the longitudinal changes and molecular mechanisms involved in response to GMA treatment.

D. Kioroglu1 , J.L. Cabriada2, U. M. Marigorta1,3, I. Rodríguez-Lago Ueg journal

Volume11, Issue S8 Supplement: 31st United European Gastroenterology Week 2023 October 2023 Pages 799

Introduction: Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) is a non-pharmacological therapy approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), mainly in steroid-dependent cases. Its mechanism of action is based onthe removal of activated leukocytes, but its exact immunological changes have not been fully described yet. Aims & Methods: Our aim was to characterize the response in the transcriptome at the single-cell resolution level and cell population effects of GMA device. We analysed scRNASeq data from peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells (PBMC) of two UC patients undergoing their first GMA session. Their gene expression profile was compared before (PRE) and one month after (POST) the GMA treatment, from the inflow and outflow lines, respectively. The analytical pipeline included quality control and filtering, cell-type annotation, differential gene expression and pathway enrichment analysis. Results: Two patients with UC (mean age 59 years; both E2) were included.Overall, the cell populations that appear to have been affected by the GMA treatment were natural killer cells and monocytes with both populations being reduced after the treatment. The distribution of the annotated cell-types was 2,369 B cells (PRE:50%, POST:49%), 11,462 CD4+ (PRE:49%,POST:50%) and 8,845 CD8+ T-cells (PRE:51%, POST:48%), 47 dendritic cells (PRE:40%, POST:59%), 3,773 natural killer cells (PRE:54%, POST:45%) and 2,352 monocytes (PRE:59%, POST:40%). Annotation at higher resolution identified 27 cell-types with monocytes being subannotated as 1,972 CD14 (PRE:62%, POST:37%) and 380 CD16 (PRE:48%, POST:51%) monocytes. Differential gene expression analysis identified in total 86 significant genes across six cell-types (CD4+ naive and central memory T-cells, natural killer cells, B intermediate cells, double-negative T-cells and CD14monocytes) with 63% of these genes being downregulated after the GMA treatment. Pathway enrichment analysis identified higher contribution of the double-negative T-cells to the enriching genes. More specifically, after the treatment the double-negative T-cells exhibited upregulation of the NEFL that is associated with the MAPK cascade and downregulation of genes related to immune response and signalling pathways. Regarding the CD14 monocytes, after the GMA treatment we observed significant downregulation of the genes LINC02315, IGHEP1 and IGHE, with the latter being linked to innate immune response pathways. Conclusion: GMA induces a range of modifications in the gene expression profile across different cell types that change the immunological environment of UC patients.

Allergic and Immunologic Diseases

A Practical Guide to the Evaluation, Diagnosis and Management of Allergic and Immunologic Diseases 2022, Pages 1527-1583

Apheresis is a term for a group of extracorporeal treatments in which blood is separated into its components, with some components being discarded and replaced or subsequently modified. The replacement fluids/cells or modified components, along with the remainder of the blood, are then returned to the patient. These procedures can alter the immune system, both humoral and cellular, and have been used to treat a variety of common and uncommon immunologic diseases beginning in the late 1950s. The basic background information important for understanding those apheresis procedures used to treat immunologic disorders as well as the important patient considerations are discussed. A synopsis of immunologic diseases treated with apheresis, based upon the American Society for Apheresis Guidelines for the use of apheresis in clinical practice, is provided including treatment schedules and “dosing,” patient evaluation and laboratory monitoring, and the proposed mechanism of action. Unique considerations for each treatment, such as their effects on patient management and concurrent therapies, are also discussed. Apheresis is a group of related therapies that can effectively treat several immunologic diseases with a growing but still a limited base of published evidence.

The use of therapeutic apheresis in allergic and immunological diseases – ScienceDirect

Zhaobei Cai ^1 2, Shu Wang ³, Jiannan Li ¹ Front Med (Lausanne)  2021 Dec 20;8:765474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765474. eCollection 2021.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as a global disease, has attracted much research interest. Constant research has led to a better understanding of the disease condition and further promoted its management. We here reviewed the conventional and the novel drugs and therapies, as well as the potential ones, which have shown promise in preclinical studies and are likely to be effective future therapies. The conventional treatments aim at controlling symptoms through pharmacotherapy, including aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, with other general measures and/or surgical resection if necessary. However, a considerable fraction of patients do not respond to available treatments or lose response, which calls for new therapeutic strategies. Diverse therapeutic options are emerging, involving small molecules, apheresis therapy, improved intestinal microecology, cell therapy, and exosome therapy. In addition, patient education partly upgrades the efficacy of IBD treatment. Recent advances in the management of IBD have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment goals, from targeting symptom-free daily life to shooting for mucosal healing. In this review, the latest progress in IBD treatment is summarized to understand the advantages, pitfalls, and research prospects of different drugs and therapies and to provide a basis for the clinical decision and further research of IBD.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34988090/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720971/

Daniel Vasile Balaban and Mariana Jinga Crohn’s Disease Recent Advances book, October 15th, 2020 DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93605

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have become a major focus for gastroenterologists worldwide, with the increasing incidence and complexity of cases, which pose therapeutic challenges. Currently available approaches fail in controlling the disease activity in a significant proportion of patients and some of the therapies are associated with significant adverse events. Although new molecules are on the horizon and treatment strategies have been optimized, novel therapeutic tools are much needed in IBD for patients who fail to attain control of the disease. Apheresis is now a common non-pharmacological therapeutic modality used in several pathologies, IBD also. In the current review, we summarize currently available evidence with respect to selective apheresis in IBD.

https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/73330

Takuro Kanekura ¹, Koichi Kawahara ² , Int J Infect Dis 2020 Oct;99:1-2. 

To our knowledge, GMA has a good safety profile; serious adverse effects are rarely reported. Its modes of action together with the findings of this case report support our notion that GMA is a relevant therapeutic option for patients with COVID-19 and warrants an immediate clinical trial to evaluate its full therapeutic efficacy in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32721534/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834290/pdf/main.pdf

Nina Worel ¹, Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani ², Erwin Strasser ³ Transfus Med Hemother 2019 Dec;46(6):394-406. doi: 10.1159/000503937. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

The section “Preparative and Therapeutic Hemapheresis” of the German Society for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology (DGTI) has reviewed the actual literature and updated techniques and indications for evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. The recommendations are mostly in line with the “Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice” published by the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) and have been conducted by experts from the DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) region.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31933569/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944925/