Scientific corner

Consensus document on the use of granulocytapheresis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Scientific corner

Developments in the apheresis procedure for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Alvaro A Pineda 1 , Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006 Jan;12 Suppl 1:S10-4.

Initially used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, nonselective therapeutic leukocytapheresis was applied to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as early as the 1980s. Since then, the process has been further refined and 2 blood perfusion systems using membrane filtration are presently employed in Japan and Europe for the selective removal of leukocytes in patients with IBD: Cellsorba is a column of polyethylenephtarate fibers that captures lymphocytes and granulocytes, and Adacolumn is a column of cellulose acetate beads that selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes. These systems overcome the limitations of centrifugation. Leukocytapheresis has been shown to exert an overall anti-inflammatory effect, as peripheral leukocytes demonstrated a diminished capacity to produce inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1beta. In addition, down-regulation in the expression of adhesion molecule L-selectin and a shift toward a more immature granulocyte phenotype were observed in the peripheral blood. The safety and beneficial therapeutic effect of leukocytapheresis in IBD are being investigated further.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16378005/

Scientific corner

Case Report: Combination Therapy With Granulocyte Apheresis and Infliximab for Refractory Crohn’s Disease

P. Gonzalez Carro, F. Perez Roldan, O. Roncero Garcıa Escribano,R. Lafuente, M.L. Legaz Huidobro, and A. Amigo Echenagusıa

Journal of Clinical Apheresis 21: 249–251 (2006)

To our knowledge, no cases of combined therapy with infliximab and granulocyte apheresis have been previously reported. Our results suggest that this combined therapy is a possible alternative to treat CD patients in the event of loss of response to infliximab.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.20093

Scientific corner

Is there a role for apheresis in gastrointestinal disorders?

Toshifumi Hibi 1Atsushi Sakuraba, Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 May;2(5):200-1.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16265186/

Scientific corner

Dramatic response to granulocytapheresis in a Crohn’s disease case complicated by hepatitis C virus

Scientific corner

Filtering out the phagocytes in inflammatory bowel disease

Steven J BrownThomas UllmanDavid B Sachar, J Clin Gastroenterol. Nov-Dec 2005;39(10):845-6.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16208106/

Scientific corner

Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis for refractory Crohn’s disease: an open multicenter prospective study

Yoshihiro Fukuda 1Toshiyuki MatsuiYasuo SuzukiKazunari KankeTakayuki MatsumotoMasakazu TakazoeTakayuki MatsumotoSatoshi MotoyaTerasu HonmaKoji SawadaTsuneyoshi YaoTakashi ShimoyamaToshifumi Hibi, J Gastroenterol
. 2004 Dec;39(12):1158-64. doi: 10.1007/s00535-004-1465-z.

GCAP could be effective for inducing remission and improving quality of life in patients with active CD that is refractory to conventional therapy.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15622479/

Scientific corner

Adsorptive Monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP) for refractory Crohn’s disease

Takeshi Kusaka 1Ken FukunagaKunio OhnishiTadashi KosakaToshihiko TomitaYoko YokoyamaKoji SawadaYoshihiro FukudaHiroto MiwaTakayuki Matsumoto

J Clin Apher. 2004;19(4):168-73. doi: 10.1002/jca.20023.

Six patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) unresponsive to conventional medications (CM) were treated with Monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP). CD patients who scored 200-400 points in Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) in spite of receiving CM, including enteral nutrition, for at least 2 weeks were enrolled in our double series trial. Each series had 5 weekly M-GCAP and 2 follow-up weeks, and each M-GCAP treated 1,800 ml of patient’s peripheral blood. After the 1st series, patients who decreased more than 50 points on the CDAI were deemed responders and enrolled in the second series. Patients with a CDAI score less than 150 points were considered in remission. The patients’ quality of life was evaluated using an index (IBDQ) before and after the 1st series. The CDAI was significantly decreased comparing before and after the 1st series (258.2 +/- 36.2 vs. 166.5 +/- 16.6; P < 0.02). 50% of patients (3/6) responded to the therapy, and one case (16.7%) could be induced to remission. Significant removal was revealed only for white blood cells (25.6 +/- 16.9%; P < 0.05), especially granulocytes (29.5 +/- 22.5%; P < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement of IBDQ was revealed in the responders’ group (162.3 +/- 17.2 vs. 189.3 +/- 11.5; P < 0.03). M-GCAP could be an effective adjunctive therapy for active CD patients unresponsive to CM allowing them to maintain a high QOL. However, it might be difficult to improve patients who could not be induced to remission after the 1st series by applying another series.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15597346/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.20023

Scientific corner

Granulocyteaphaeresis in steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, open, pilot study

E Domènech 1J HinojosaM Esteve-ComasF GomollónJ M HerreraG BastidaA ObradorR RuizC SaroM A GassullSpanish Group for the Study of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU)

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Dec;20(11-12):1347-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02288.x.

Background: Uncontrolled studies suggest that granulocyteaphaeresis might be useful in the management of active ulcerative colitis. Aim: To assess the efficacy of granulocyteaphaeresis treatment in active steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, open, pilot study in patients with steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. All patients were started on 60 mg/day of prednisone; after 1 week, a five-session programme of granulocyteaphaeresis (once per week) was started. The steroid dose was tapered weekly if there was clinical improvement. Remission was defined as an inactive clinical activity index together with complete withdrawal of steroids at week 6. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months or until disease relapse. Results: Twenty-six patients (14 ulcerative colitis, 12 Crohn’s disease) were included. More than a half had been previously treated with immunomodulators. Remission was achieved in 62 and 70% of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively. During a median follow-up of 12.6 months, six of eight ulcerative colitis patients maintained their clinical remission; however, only one Crohn’s disease patient remained in remission after the first 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Granulocyteaphaeresis is a safe treatment option in inflammatory bowel disease. A five-session programme of granulocyteaphaeresis seems to be efficient in the treatment of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, but not in Crohn’s disease.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15606397/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02288.x

Scientific corner

Experience with granulocytapheresis in Crohn’s disease

Cuenca, F & Paredes, J & Mendoza, J & Cruz, D & Herrero, A & Díaz-Rubio, M.Revista española de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva .2004,96. 501-3, 504. DOI:10.4321/S1130-01082004000700007.

Objective: To describe our experience with granulocyte apheresis to induce remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease refractory to conventional treatment. We summarize the results previously obtained with this technique.

Conclusions: Granulocyte apheresis is a safe and well tolerated therapeutic modality that can be a valid therapeutic alternative in the induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease, although controlled clinical trials must be conducted to define long-term efficacy, as well as to establish “optimal patient” selection, re-treatment interval, and number of sessions.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15283632/

Contact UsFor more information

Contact Us