J L Cabriada 1, E Doménech, F Gomollón, P González-Carro, V González-Lara, J Hinojosa, C E Jiménez-López, P Nos, A Obrador, J Panès, C Saro, V Varea, R Lafuente, M Guilera, Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Feb;29(2):85-92.
Tag: Crohn's disease
Scientific corner
Consensus document on the use of granulocytapheresis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Scientific corner
Developments in the apheresis procedure for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
Alvaro A Pineda 1 , Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006 Jan;12 Suppl 1:S10-4.
Initially used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, nonselective therapeutic leukocytapheresis was applied to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as early as the 1980s. Since then, the process has been further refined and 2 blood perfusion systems using membrane filtration are presently employed in Japan and Europe for the selective removal of leukocytes in patients with IBD: Cellsorba is a column of polyethylenephtarate fibers that captures lymphocytes and granulocytes, and Adacolumn is a column of cellulose acetate beads that selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes. These systems overcome the limitations of centrifugation. Leukocytapheresis has been shown to exert an overall anti-inflammatory effect, as peripheral leukocytes demonstrated a diminished capacity to produce inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1beta. In addition, down-regulation in the expression of adhesion molecule L-selectin and a shift toward a more immature granulocyte phenotype were observed in the peripheral blood. The safety and beneficial therapeutic effect of leukocytapheresis in IBD are being investigated further.
Scientific corner
Case Report: Combination Therapy With Granulocyte Apheresis and Infliximab for Refractory Crohn’s Disease
P. Gonzalez Carro, F. Perez Roldan, O. Roncero Garcıa Escribano,R. Lafuente, M.L. Legaz Huidobro, and A. Amigo Echenagusıa
Journal of Clinical Apheresis 21: 249–251 (2006)
To our knowledge, no cases of combined therapy with infliximab and granulocyte apheresis have been previously reported. Our results suggest that this combined therapy is a possible alternative to treat CD patients in the event of loss of response to infliximab.
Scientific corner
Is there a role for apheresis in gastrointestinal disorders?
Toshifumi Hibi 1, Atsushi Sakuraba, Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 May;2(5):200-1.
Scientific corner
Dramatic response to granulocytapheresis in a Crohn’s disease case complicated by hepatitis C virus
Koji Sawada 1, Kunio Ohnishi, Takeshi Kusaka, Yoshika Matoba, Ken Fukunaga, Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Aug;50(8):1533-4.
Scientific corner
Filtering out the phagocytes in inflammatory bowel disease
Steven J Brown, Thomas Ullman, David B Sachar, J Clin Gastroenterol. Nov-Dec 2005;39(10):845-6.
Scientific corner
Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis for refractory Crohn’s disease: an open multicenter prospective study
Yoshihiro Fukuda 1, Toshiyuki Matsui, Yasuo Suzuki, Kazunari Kanke, Takayuki Matsumoto, Masakazu Takazoe, Takayuki Matsumoto, Satoshi Motoya, Terasu Honma, Koji Sawada, Tsuneyoshi Yao, Takashi Shimoyama, Toshifumi Hibi, J Gastroenterol
. 2004 Dec;39(12):1158-64. doi: 10.1007/s00535-004-1465-z.
GCAP could be effective for inducing remission and improving quality of life in patients with active CD that is refractory to conventional therapy.
Scientific corner
Adsorptive Monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP) for refractory Crohn’s disease
Takeshi Kusaka 1, Ken Fukunaga, Kunio Ohnishi, Tadashi Kosaka, Toshihiko Tomita, Yoko Yokoyama, Koji Sawada, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Hiroto Miwa, Takayuki Matsumoto
Six patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) unresponsive to conventional medications (CM) were treated with Monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP). CD patients who scored 200-400 points in Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) in spite of receiving CM, including enteral nutrition, for at least 2 weeks were enrolled in our double series trial. Each series had 5 weekly M-GCAP and 2 follow-up weeks, and each M-GCAP treated 1,800 ml of patient’s peripheral blood. After the 1st series, patients who decreased more than 50 points on the CDAI were deemed responders and enrolled in the second series. Patients with a CDAI score less than 150 points were considered in remission. The patients’ quality of life was evaluated using an index (IBDQ) before and after the 1st series. The CDAI was significantly decreased comparing before and after the 1st series (258.2 +/- 36.2 vs. 166.5 +/- 16.6; P < 0.02). 50% of patients (3/6) responded to the therapy, and one case (16.7%) could be induced to remission. Significant removal was revealed only for white blood cells (25.6 +/- 16.9%; P < 0.05), especially granulocytes (29.5 +/- 22.5%; P < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement of IBDQ was revealed in the responders’ group (162.3 +/- 17.2 vs. 189.3 +/- 11.5; P < 0.03). M-GCAP could be an effective adjunctive therapy for active CD patients unresponsive to CM allowing them to maintain a high QOL. However, it might be difficult to improve patients who could not be induced to remission after the 1st series by applying another series.
Scientific corner
Granulocyteaphaeresis in steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, open, pilot study
E Domènech 1, J Hinojosa, M Esteve-Comas, F Gomollón, J M Herrera, G Bastida, A Obrador, R Ruiz, C Saro, M A Gassull, Spanish Group for the Study of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU)
Background: Uncontrolled studies suggest that granulocyteaphaeresis might be useful in the management of active ulcerative colitis. Aim: To assess the efficacy of granulocyteaphaeresis treatment in active steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, open, pilot study in patients with steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. All patients were started on 60 mg/day of prednisone; after 1 week, a five-session programme of granulocyteaphaeresis (once per week) was started. The steroid dose was tapered weekly if there was clinical improvement. Remission was defined as an inactive clinical activity index together with complete withdrawal of steroids at week 6. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months or until disease relapse. Results: Twenty-six patients (14 ulcerative colitis, 12 Crohn’s disease) were included. More than a half had been previously treated with immunomodulators. Remission was achieved in 62 and 70% of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively. During a median follow-up of 12.6 months, six of eight ulcerative colitis patients maintained their clinical remission; however, only one Crohn’s disease patient remained in remission after the first 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Granulocyteaphaeresis is a safe treatment option in inflammatory bowel disease. A five-session programme of granulocyteaphaeresis seems to be efficient in the treatment of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, but not in Crohn’s disease.
Scientific corner
Experience with granulocytapheresis in Crohn’s disease
Cuenca, F & Paredes, J & Mendoza, J & Cruz, D & Herrero, A & Díaz-Rubio, M.Revista española de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva .2004,96. 501-3, 504. DOI:10.4321/S1130-01082004000700007.
Objective: To describe our experience with granulocyte apheresis to induce remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease refractory to conventional treatment. We summarize the results previously obtained with this technique.
Conclusions: Granulocyte apheresis is a safe and well tolerated therapeutic modality that can be a valid therapeutic alternative in the induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease, although controlled clinical trials must be conducted to define long-term efficacy, as well as to establish “optimal patient” selection, re-treatment interval, and number of sessions.
Contact UsFor more information
Contact Us