D. Kioroglu1 , J.L. Cabriada2, U. M. Marigorta1,3, I. Rodríguez-Lago Ueg journal

Volume11, Issue S8 Supplement: 31st United European Gastroenterology Week 2023 October 2023 Pages 799

Introduction: Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) is a non-pharmacological therapy approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), mainly in steroid-dependent cases. Its mechanism of action is based onthe removal of activated leukocytes, but its exact immunological changes have not been fully described yet. Aims & Methods: Our aim was to characterize the response in the transcriptome at the single-cell resolution level and cell population effects of GMA device. We analysed scRNASeq data from peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells (PBMC) of two UC patients undergoing their first GMA session. Their gene expression profile was compared before (PRE) and one month after (POST) the GMA treatment, from the inflow and outflow lines, respectively. The analytical pipeline included quality control and filtering, cell-type annotation, differential gene expression and pathway enrichment analysis. Results: Two patients with UC (mean age 59 years; both E2) were included.Overall, the cell populations that appear to have been affected by the GMA treatment were natural killer cells and monocytes with both populations being reduced after the treatment. The distribution of the annotated cell-types was 2,369 B cells (PRE:50%, POST:49%), 11,462 CD4+ (PRE:49%,POST:50%) and 8,845 CD8+ T-cells (PRE:51%, POST:48%), 47 dendritic cells (PRE:40%, POST:59%), 3,773 natural killer cells (PRE:54%, POST:45%) and 2,352 monocytes (PRE:59%, POST:40%). Annotation at higher resolution identified 27 cell-types with monocytes being subannotated as 1,972 CD14 (PRE:62%, POST:37%) and 380 CD16 (PRE:48%, POST:51%) monocytes. Differential gene expression analysis identified in total 86 significant genes across six cell-types (CD4+ naive and central memory T-cells, natural killer cells, B intermediate cells, double-negative T-cells and CD14monocytes) with 63% of these genes being downregulated after the GMA treatment. Pathway enrichment analysis identified higher contribution of the double-negative T-cells to the enriching genes. More specifically, after the treatment the double-negative T-cells exhibited upregulation of the NEFL that is associated with the MAPK cascade and downregulation of genes related to immune response and signalling pathways. Regarding the CD14 monocytes, after the GMA treatment we observed significant downregulation of the genes LINC02315, IGHEP1 and IGHE, with the latter being linked to innate immune response pathways. Conclusion: GMA induces a range of modifications in the gene expression profile across different cell types that change the immunological environment of UC patients.