Scientific corner

Extracorporeal leukocyte removal therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis

Masami Kumagai 1Yasuhiko YamatoKohji MaedaEisuke NakashimaKosuke UshijimaAkihiko Kimura,Pediatr Int. 2007 Aug;49(4):431-6.

Additional studies are needed to determine optimum timing of LCAP or GCAP and initiation of remission-maintenance therapy.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17587263/

Scientific corner

Granulocytapheresis in inflammatory bowel disease Efficacy of an induction plus maintenance sessions protocol at 32 weeks

F J Fernández Pérez 1F RodríguezC de SolaN Fernández MorenoF VeraR RiveraA Sánchez Cantos, Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007 Nov;99(11):628-35.

Introduction: Granulocytapheresis (GCAP) eliminates activated granulocytes-monocytes from peripheral blood, thus modifying the circulating pool of leukocytes and reducing intestinal inflammation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of GCAP in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using an induction and maintenance protocol. Material and method: A retrospective study including patients with active corticosteroid-dependent or refractory IBD. Induction included 5 sessions in ulcerative colitis (UC) and 7 sessions in Crohn’s disease (CD); one monthly session was used thereafter until week 32. Clinical activity indices and use of corticosteroids were monitored. Results: Eighteen patients were included (10 with UC, 8 with CD), 10 of them dependent on and 8 refractory to corticosteroids. Fourteen of them were refractory and a further 4 were intolerant to immunosuppressants (IS). Induction was not completed in 2 UC (severe relapses) and 1 CD (side-effects) patients. One UC and 3 CD patients withdrew during maintenance. Among patients who completed induction, response or remission was achieved in 87.5% of UC cases (2 and 5 patients) and 71.4% of CD cases (1 and 4 patients), respectively. At week 32 response-remission rates reached 75% in CU (3 and 3 patients) and 42.8% in CD (1 and 2 patients) cases, respectively. Corticosteroid withdrawal was possible in 14.2% of CD and in 62.5% of UC patients (25% in remission and 37.5% with response). There were two major side effects (thrombophlebitis and syncope). No colectomies were performed for UC patients who completed GCAP induction after a mean follow-up of 97.6 weeks (range: 72-128). Conclusions: Both UC and CD respond well to GCAP induction. At 32 weeks UC patients maintain similar response-remission rates (87.5 vs. 75%), whereas almost one-third of CD patients lose response. Granulocytapheresis is an alternative, steroid-sparing treatment modality to induce and maintain remission in UC, while good patient selection and a maintenance protocol not well defined yet are needed for CD.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18271660/

)http://www.grupoaran.com/mrmUpdate/lecturaPDFfromXML.asp?IdArt=459857&TO=RVN&Eng=1

Scientific corner

Therapeutic leukocytapheresis for inflammatory bowel disease

Abbi R.Saniabadi, HiroyukiHanai, KenFukunaga, KojiSawada, ChikakoShima, IngvarBjarnason, RobertLofberg, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2007.08.003

The inference that granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages (GM) are part of the immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and hence should be targets of therapy stems from observations of elevated, and activated GM in patients with IBD. The Adacolumn can selectively deplete GM by adsorption (GMA) and in patients with IBD. GMA has been associated with significant clinical efficacy together with sustained suppression of inflammatory cytokine profiles. Additionally, GMA depleted proinflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocytes and was followed by an increase in CD4+ T lymphocytes including the regulatory CD4+CD25high+Foxp3 phenotype. Hence, GMA could be a non-pharmacologic therapy for IBD with potential to spare steroids and other unsafe pharmacologic preparations.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1473050207001164

Scientific corner

Leucocyte apheresis in the treatment of paediatric ulcerative colitis

Scientific corner

Granulocytapheresis: Old procedures, new solution

M P Martínez Montiel, Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007 Nov;99(11):623-7.

To conclude, granulocytapheresis is a well-tolerated immunomodulating therapy with few side effects and good results in the management of corticoid-dependent or resistant UC, naïve patients, and pediatric subjects; it could be even considered during pregnancy. Results are less clear in CD. Some aspects remain to be elucidated, including session number and duration, and a potential maintenance regimen. Pharmacoeconomics studies are necessary to find the proper place for this technique within
IBD treatment algorithms. Therapy strategies will likely be developed in the future that will combine GMCAP with immunosuppressants and/or biological therapies

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18271659/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385558/pdf/WJG-21-4078.pdf

Scientific corner

Treatment of inflammatory immunologic disease: Leukocytapheresis for inflammatory immunologic disease (tentative)

Mamoru Watanabe 1Daisuke KubotaMasakazu NagahoriTakanori Kanai , Intern Med
. 2007;46(16):1305-6.

Opinion about effectiviness, safety , number of treated patientes and potential indications of LCAP and GMA.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17704611/

Scientific corner

Factors affecting clinical and endoscopic efficacies of selective leucocytapheresis for ulcerative colitis

T Yamamoto 1A R SaniabadiY MaruyamaS UmegaeK Matsumoto, Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Jul;39(7):626-33.

Based on the outcomes of this study, it appears that steroid-naïve patients and patients on low dose steroid and short duration of exposure respond to granulocyte, monocyte/macrophage adsorptive apheresis. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients should strengthen our findings.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17532273/

Scientific corner

Leukocytapheresis as promising therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

R Caprilli 1V D’Ovidio, Dig Liver Dis. 2007 May;39(5):435-7.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17379590/

Scientific corner

Treatment of patients with acute ulcerative colitis: conventional corticosteroid therapy (MP) versus granulocytapheresis (GMA): a pilot study

G Bresci 1G ParisiA MazzoniF ScatenaA Capria, Dig Liver Dis. 2007 May;39(5):430-4.

Granulocytapheresis represents a new and promising approach to active ulcerative colitis. In fact, even if more expensive than conventional corticosteroids, it seems slightly more effective and, above all, with side effects much less frequent and serious. Thus, granulocytapheresis cycles could be prolonged or repeated, if necessary, in more severe diseases without significant risks for the patients.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17379588/

Scientific corner

Granulocytapheresis (GCAP) for severe alcoholic hepatitis-A preliminary report

Ryukichi Kumashiro 1Yuriko KogaReiichirou KuwaharaTatsuya IdeTeruko HinoKazuo TanakaAkiko HisamochiKei OgataYukari TakaoHiroyuki KogaHidemi NishidaSeiya OkudaTeruo SakamotoMichio Sata, Hepatol Res. 2006 Nov;36(3):229-36.

GCAP therapy deserves further evaluation as a new therapeutic modality for a moderately severe alcoholic hepatitis.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16949861/

Contact UsFor more information

Contact Us