Walter Jauregui ¹, Yozahandy A Abarca ², Yasmin Ahmadi ³, Vaishnavi B Menon ⁴, Daniela A Zumárraga ⁵, Maria Camila Rojas Gomez ⁶, Aleeza Basri ⁷, Rohitha S Madala ⁸, Peter Girgis ⁹, Zahra Nazir ¹⁰

Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68569. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Psoriasis (PS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are immune-mediated chronic conditions that share pathophysiological processes, including immune system dysfunction, microbiome dysbiosis, and inflammatory pathways. These pathways result in increased turnover of epithelial cells and compromised barrier function. The assessment of the literature suggests that immunopathogenic mechanisms, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α signaling and IL-23/IL-17 axis dysregulation, are shared by PS and IBD. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic approaches overlap significantly, and advances in biomarker identification benefit both conditions. Current treatments, namely biologics that target TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23, show promising results in decreasing inflammation and controlling symptoms. Precision medicine approaches are prioritized in prospective therapeutic procedures to tailor pharmaceuticals based on specific biomarkers, perhaps improving outcomes and minimizing side effects. This study thoroughly examines and evaluates the body of research on PS and IBD. Several papers were examined to compile data on clinical features, diagnosis, therapies, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and potential future therapeutic developments. The selection of articles was based on three methodological qualities: relevance and addition to the knowledge of IBD and PS. The retrieved data were combined to provide a coherent summary of the state of the knowledge and to spot new trends. The overview of the latest studies demonstrates that both PS and IBD share pathophysiological foundations and therapeutic approaches. With a spotlight on particular biomarkers, advances in precision medicine provide a promising path toward enhancing therapeutic effectiveness and minimizing side effects.

in CD Moderate to severe Oral corticosteroids. Consider enteral nutritional therapy. TNF inhibitors are recommended to be considered for steroid-dependent or refractory patients. If pharmacotherapy or nutrition therapy is ineffective or unable to adapt, the combination with granulocyte monocyte apheresis (GMA) can be considered.

Teagan S Edwards ¹, Andrew S Day ¹

Expert Rev Mol Diagn.. 2024 Jun;24(6):497-508. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2375224. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), is a relapsing and remitting condition. Noninvasive biomarkers have an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of IBD and in the prediction of future disease course in individuals with IBD. Strategies for the management of IBD increasingly rely upon close monitoring of gastrointestinal inflammation.

Areas covered: This review provides an update on the current understanding of established and novel stool-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of IBD. It also highlights key gaps, identifies limitations, and advantages of current markers, and examines aspects that require further study and analysis.

Expert opinion: Current noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in the diagnosis and management of IBD; however, limitations exist. Future work is required to further characterize and validate current and novel markers of inflammation. In addition, it is essential to better understand the roles and characteristics of noninvasive markers to enable the appropriate selection to accurately determine the condition of the intestinal mucosa.

• Noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in diagnosis and management of IBD.
• Fecal inflammatory markers can reflect gut inflammation in IBD; however, they are not specific and various limitations must be considered.
• Although FCal is the most well-established and routinely used marker in IBD, it may have reduced sensitivity and specificity in some settings.
• Several emerging biomarkers including MPO have been assessed and show promise.
• Identification of effective and accurate noninvasive markers of inflammation may limit the need for repeat invasive endoscopic examinations in the future.

Yuko Higashi, Munekazu Yamakuchi, Takuro Kanekura

poster at ISFA 2019 pag 126

Neutrophilic skin diseases are a group of disorders characterized by intense dermal infiltration of neutrophils without infection. They include a variety of diseases, such as pyoderma gangrenosum, pustular psoriasis, and palmoplantar pustulosis. We demonstrated that granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis (GMA) is a useful treatment modality for such refractory skin diseases. Microarray analysis of microRNAs (miRNAs) was performed using sera of patients with neutrophilic skin diseases before and after GMA. Several miRNAs significantly increased in patients compared to control subjects. The expression of three
miRNAs decreased after apheresis, suggesting that these miRNAs might be involved in the pathogenesis of neutrophilic skin decreases. To prove the function of these miRNAs, HL-60, a human acute promyelocytic leukemia cell line, was differentiated by the treatment of alltrans retinoic acid (ATRA). When HL-60 was differentiated to neutrophilic cells, the HEstaining shows an increased cytoplasm to nucleus ratio, condensated chromatin, and nuclear segmentation. The expression of three miRNAs increased during the neutrophilic differentiation. Stimulation of ATRA-treated HL-60 by some cytokines altered miRNA expressions. Moreover, manipulation of these miRNAs changed proliferation of cultured keratinocytes. These data
suggest that miRNAs play an important role in regulating neutrophilic differentiation and proliferation of keratinocytes in case of neutrophilic disorders such as psoriasis. These miRNAs could be markers of disease severity and response of GMA.