Nobuhiro Ueno 1 2, Yu Kobayashi 3, Aki Sakatani 2, Tatsuya Dokoshi 3, Keitaro Takahashi 3, Katsuyoshi Ando 3, Shin Kashima 3, Kentaro Moriichi 3, Hiroki Tanabe 3, Yuki Kamikokura 4, Mishie Tanino 4, Mikihiro Fujiya 2
Tag : fecal calprotectin
Section scientifique
Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis Maintenance Therapy Restored the Loss of Response to Anti-TNF-Alpha Agents in the Patients With UC: A Case Report
J Clin Apher. 2025 Jun;40(3):e70030. doi: 10.1002/jca.70030.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition requiring lifelong management, with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) agents often used for refractory cases. However, secondary loss of response (LOR) to these agents, due to anti-drug antibodies, poses a significant therapeutic challenge. This report describes a case where granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) maintenance therapy successfully restored the efficacy of an anti-TNF-α agent in a 26-year-old male with active UC experiencing LOR to infliximab. Following GMA induction therapy and continued infliximab administration, clinical symptoms improved, fecal calprotectin levels decreased, and clinical remission was achieved. Long-term maintenance with GMA enabled sustained clinical remission, with mucosal healing observed one year post-therapy. This case suggests that GMA maintenance therapy may serve as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with active UC experiencing LOR to anti-TNF-α agents. However, further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and validate its efficacy.
Section scientifique
The role of fecal biomarkers in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38995110/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14737159.2024.2375224
Expert Rev Mol Diagn.. 2024 Jun;24(6):497-508. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2024.2375224. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), is a relapsing and remitting condition. Noninvasive biomarkers have an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of IBD and in the prediction of future disease course in individuals with IBD. Strategies for the management of IBD increasingly rely upon close monitoring of gastrointestinal inflammation.
Areas covered: This review provides an update on the current understanding of established and novel stool-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of IBD. It also highlights key gaps, identifies limitations, and advantages of current markers, and examines aspects that require further study and analysis.
Expert opinion: Current noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in the diagnosis and management of IBD; however, limitations exist. Future work is required to further characterize and validate current and novel markers of inflammation. In addition, it is essential to better understand the roles and characteristics of noninvasive markers to enable the appropriate selection to accurately determine the condition of the intestinal mucosa.
- Noninvasive inflammatory markers play an important role in diagnosis and management of IBD.
- Fecal inflammatory markers can reflect gut inflammation in IBD; however, they are not specific and various limitations must be considered.
- Although FCal is the most well-established and routinely used marker in IBD, it may have reduced sensitivity and specificity in some settings.
- Several emerging biomarkers including MPO have been assessed and show promise.
- Identification of effective and accurate noninvasive markers of inflammation may limit the need for repeat invasive endoscopic examinations in the future.
Section scientifique
P582 Combination of granulocyte–monocyte apheresis and ustekinumab: multicentre and retrospective study
Background
Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports have also described its combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF.
Methods
The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentric study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined GMA plus UST. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and time of each session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing the GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding UST intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and surgery were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.
Results
Nineteen patients were included (15 UC, 2 Crohn’s disease, 2 unclassified IBD; median age 48 years (IQR, 36-63); 68% male). At baseline, 78% were receiving steroids and 23% immunomodulators. Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab. Baseline Mayo score was 6.5 (IQR, 5-7), with a median CRP of 9 mg/L (IQR, 4.8-20.8) and faecal calprotectin 1,612 mg/kg (IQR, 873-4,152). GMA was started mostly after PNR in 83%, the median number of GMA sessions was 16 (IQR, 11-27) and 50% of patients started maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 6 months after the last GMA session (p=0.019). During follow-up, 27% started a new biologic therapy and 13% required surgery. 64% of patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. Adverse events were reported in 5% of patients.
Conclusion
GMA can safely recapture the response to UST in refractory patients after PNR or LOR to this drug.
Section scientifique
P426 Hematological Composite Scores in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
A Morant-Domínguez , B Vera-Santana , A Hernández-Camba , L Ramos , I Alonso-Abreu , N Hernández Álvarez-Buylla , M Vela , M Hernández-Guerra , A Laura , I Ferraz-Amaro , M Carrillo Palau
Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, Volume 18, Issue Supplement_1, January 2024, Page i870, https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0556
Background: Ulcerative colitis (CU) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are described as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Emerging as potential blood-based inflammatory biomarkers in various chronic diseases are the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIRI, calculated as neutrophils × monocytes/lymphocytes). In this work we aim to analyze if these hematological composite scores differ between IBD patients and healthy controls, and whether they are related to disease activity.
Methods: A total of 197 IBD patients, 130 with CD and 67 with CU, and 208 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. NLR, MLR, PLR, and SIRI were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to study whether these scores differ between patients and controls and how they related to IBD activity scores.
Results: After multivariable analysis adjustment, NLR and PLR, but not SIRI and MLR, were significantly higher in IBD patients compared to controls (table 1). C-reactive protein and SIRI and NLR correlated in patients with IBD. Nevertheless, fecal calprotectin was not related to none of these blood scores. Besides, disease activity parameters were not associated with any of the composite blood-based scores in both patients with CD and CU.
Conclusion: NLR and PLR, independently, are heightened in IBD patients in contrast to controls. However, SIRI and MLR do not share this distinction. Surprisingly, none of the four hematological scores displayed correlations with disease activity in either CD or UC patients.
Section scientifique
PP0916 COMBINATION OF GRANULOCYTE–MONOCYTE APHERESIS AND TOFACITINIB: MULTICENTRE AND RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
I. Rodríguez-Lago1, F. Cañete2, E. Guerra3, C. Herrera de Guise4, E. Iglesias-Flores5, E. Leo-Carnerero6, Y. Zabana7, M. Barreiro de Acosta8, D. Ginard Vicens9, J.L. Cabriada Nuño1
UEG journal 2023 SUPPLEMENT ABSTRACT UEG Week 2023 Poster Presentations 15 October 2023 page 1067
Introduction: Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports
have also described its combination with biologics.
Aims & Methods: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentre study was performed in 7 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined plus GMA and TOFA. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and length of each
session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding TOFA intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and colectomy were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.
Results: Twelve patients with UC were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3; 75% non-smokers). Patients were receiving TOFA10 mg bid (75%), 5 mg bid (16%), or 15 mg bid (8%), with 33% receiving
steroids at baseline. All patients had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents, 42% to vedolizumab and 8% ustekinumab. Median baseline Mayo score was 7 (IQR, 5-7), median CRP of 11 mg/L (IQR, 5-32) and faecal calprotectin 800 mg/kg (IQ, 715-2,094). GMA was started mostly after PNR (73%), and the median number of GMA sessions was 11 (IQR, 3-20) and 50% received maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 1 month after the last GMA session (p=0.027). Four patients (36%) were switched to a new therapy and no patient required colectomy during follow-up. All patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. No patient reported adverse events related to the combination therapy.
Conclusion: Combination of GMA with TOFA can be an effective and safe therapy in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.
Section scientifique
Targeting neutrophils in inflammatory bowel disease: revisiting the role of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35833363/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epub/10.1080/17474124.2022.2100759?needAccess=true
Giorgos Bamias 1, Evanthia Zampeli 2, Eugeni Domènech 3 Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022 Jul 19;1-15. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2100759.
Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the gastrointestinal tract comprising Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). While any part of the digestive tract can be affected in CD, mucosal inflammation in UC is limited to the colon. Differences and similarities between the two conditions are reflected by their pathophysiology. Areas covered: An overview of immunological aspects, pharmacological management, and biomarkers of IBD is provided. The role of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) is reviewed including its primary and secondary effects on the immune system, as well as clinical studies in IBD (mainly UC), and potential biomarkers for adsorptive GMA. Expert opinion: In UC, adsorptive GMA with Adacolumn (Adacolumn®, JIMRO Co., Ltd. Takasaki, Gunma, Japan) selectively depletes elevated myeloid lineage leukocytes and has a range of beneficial secondary immune effects. Adsorptive GMA is a safe and effective non-pharmacological treatment option for UC. Pilot studies have reported promising results for adsorptive GMA in combination with biological agents, although larger studies are required. Fecal calprotectin concentrations, neutrophil counts in histological samples and/or the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood may prove to be useful biomarkers for predicting GMA effectiveness in the future.
Section scientifique
Novel Prognostic Biomarkers of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Treated With Anti-TNF: Neutrophil-toLymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio
Lorenzo Bertani 1, Federico Rossari 2, Brigida Barberio 3, Maria Giulia Demarzo 4, Gherardo Tapete 1, Eleonora Albano 1, Giovanni Baiano Svizzero 1, Linda Ceccarelli 5, Maria Gloria Mumolo 5, Chiara Brombin 6, Nicola de Bortoli 1, Massimo Bellini 1, Santino Marchi 1, Giorgia Bodini 4, Edoardo Savarino 3, Francesco Costa 5
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Sep 18;26(10):1579-1587. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa062.
Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (anti-TNFs) are widely used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, many patients experience loss of response during the first year of therapy. An early predictor of clinical remission and mucosal healing is needed. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of subclinical inflammation poorly evaluated in UC patients treated with anti-TNFs. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate whether NLR and PLR could be used as prognostic markers of anti-TNF treatment response. Methods: Patients with UC who started anti-TNF treatment in monotherapy were evaluated. Patients with concomitant corticosteroid treatment ≥20 mg were excluded. We calculated NLR, PLR, and fecal calprotectin before treatment and after induction. The values of NLR and PLR were correlated with clinical remission and mucosal healing at the end of follow-up (54 weeks) using the Mann-Whitney U test and then multivariate analysis was conducted. Results: Eighty-eight patients were included. Patients who reached mucosal healing after 54 weeks of therapy displayed lower levels of both baseline NLR and PLR (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.04, respectively); similar results were obtained at week 8 (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients who presented with active ulcers at baseline endoscopic evaluation had higher baseline NLR and PLR values compared with those without detected ulcers (P = 0.002 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Conclusions: Both NLR and PLR showed a promising role as early predictors of therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in UC patients. If confirmed in larger studies, classification and regression trees proposed in this article could be useful to guide clinical decisions regarding anti-TNF treatment.
Section scientifique
Leukocytapheresis in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis
Takeshi Tomomasa 1, Hitoshi Tajiri, Seiichi Kagimoto, Toshiaki Shimizu, Atsushi Yoden, Kosuke Ushijima, Keiichi Uchida, Hiroaki Kaneko, Daiki Abukawa, Mutsuko Konno, Shun-ichi Maisawa, Takao Kohsaka, Akio Kobayashi, Japanese Study Group for Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 Jul;53(1):34-9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821058bc.
Objective: Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a nonpharmacologic therapy that has recently been used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC). This multicenter open-label study prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of LCAP in pediatric patients with UC. Patients and methods: Twenty-three patients ages 8 to 16 years with moderate (n = 19) to severe (n = 4) steroid-resistant UC were enrolled. One of 2 LCAP columns with different volumes (model EX and the half-volume model EI) was selected, according to body weight. LCAP was performed once per week for 5 consecutive weeks. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at predetermined time points. The primary endpoint was decreased stool frequency/hematochezia score, and secondary endpoints were clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic improvements. Results: The stool frequency/hematochezia score decreased significantly from 4.5 ± 1.2 before treatment to 1.6 ± 1.9 after the fifth treatment. Clinical parameters, including stool frequency, presence of visible blood, abdominal pain, and body temperature, were significantly improved. Fecal calprotectin decreased significantly. Endoscopic findings evaluated using Matts score also improved (P < 0.01). The steroid dose decreased from 1.1 ± 0.4 mg/kg before treatment to 0.8 ± 0.5 mg/kg after treatment. There were no significant differences in changes between the EX and EI columns. The incidence of adverse effects was 61%, although none was serious. The most common adverse effects were decreased hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration. Conclusions: The present study showed that LCAP was well tolerated in children with UC, mostly moderate, and was as effective as in adults. The types of pediatric patients best suited to LCAP remain to be determined.
Contactez-nousPour en savoir plus
Contactez-nous