P.M. Irving, D.S. Rampton
Tag : Safety
Section scientifique
Leucocytapheresis for ulcerative colitis
Digestive and Liver Disease 36 (2004) 799–802
we discuss the theory behind using leucocytapheresis to treat IBD, its different forms, the way in which these remove leucocytes, and the indications, efficacy, safety, and possible future role of leucocytapheresis.
if randomised controlled trials confirm its safety and efficacy in steroid-refractory colitis, it would be tempting to compare leucocytapheresis with cyclosporin rescue therapy in that it can be used on an out-patient basis and, unlike cyclosporin, is not yet reported to have serious side-effects. Furthermore, in patients refractory to aminosalicylates, leucocytapheresis could conceivably have a place as maintenance therapy. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are not always effective and have rare
but serious side-effects; leucocytapheresis, at least in theory, might be an attractive alternative.
Section scientifique
Experience with granulocytapheresis in Crohn’s disease
Cuenca, F & Paredes, J & Mendoza, J & Cruz, D & Herrero, A & Díaz-Rubio, M.Revista española de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva .2004,96. 501-3, 504. DOI:10.4321/S1130-01082004000700007.
Objective: To describe our experience with granulocyte apheresis to induce remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease refractory to conventional treatment. We summarize the results previously obtained with this technique.
Conclusions: Granulocyte apheresis is a safe and well tolerated therapeutic modality that can be a valid therapeutic alternative in the induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease, although controlled clinical trials must be conducted to define long-term efficacy, as well as to establish « optimal patient » selection, re-treatment interval, and number of sessions.
Section scientifique
Immunomodulatory therapy for inflammatory bowel disease
Kazuo Kusugami 1, Kenji Ina, Takafumi Ando, Kenji Hibi, Yuji Nishio, Hidemi Goto, J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;39(12):1129-37.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms that can greatly impair their quality of life. They must rely on multiple medications with aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and purine analogues to control these symptoms. Although decades of clinical experience in IBD management has led to optimized approaches for achieving the induction and maintenance of remission, the disease in some patients is still refractory to conventional medical treatment, or the effectiveness of these drugs can be limited by treatment-related side effects. Significant progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD has yielded several immunomodulatory approaches with novel biological agents or apparatus, such as cyclosporine, cytoprotective agents, infliximab, and leukocytapheresis. Further immunomodulatoy therapy, aiming at the inhibition of molecular and cellular mediators, is anticipated, in parallel with the clarification of immunoinflammatory pathways in IBD. An additional goal will be to identify factors predictive of response to treatment with each novel immunomodulatory agent or apparatus. This will help provide each patient with optimized and individualized therapy, thereby increasing therapeutic efficacy and reducing possible side effects.
Section scientifique
Selective granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis as a first-line treatment for steroid naïve patients with active ulcerative colitis: a prospective uncontrolled study
Corticosteroid therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with frequent adverse side effects and poor quality of life. Recently, adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage apheresis has shown efficacy in patients with severe steroid refractory UC. The objective of this study was to investigate if, instead of corticosteroids, adsorptive leukocytapheresis has efficacy as the first-line therapy for steroid-naïve patients with active UC. Twenty patients, aged 15-49 years, with a mean clinical activity index (CAI) of 8.6 were recruited. Adsorptive leukocytapheresis was done with Adacolumn, which contains cellulose acetate beads as adsorptive carriers for granulocytes and monocytes (FcgammaR and complement receptors expressing leukocytes). Each patient received 6 to 10 leukocytapheresis sessions of 60-min duration, at 2 sessions/week. Efficacy was assessed 1 week after the last session. Post treatment, the mean CAI was 3.0 (P = 0001), and 17 of 20 patients (85%) were in remission. There were significant falls in C-reactive protein (P = 0.0003), total white cell counts (P = 0.003), neutrophils (P = 0.0029), and monocytes (P = 0.0038), an increase in lymphocytes (P = 0.001), and increases in the blood levels of soluble TNF-alpha receptors I (P = 0.0007) and II (P = 0.0045) in the column outflow (blood return to the patients). Further, at 8 months, 60% of patients had maintained their remission. No severe side effects were reported. In conclusion, adsorptive leukocytapheresis should reduce corticosteroid therapy in patients with moderate UC; cases with early-stage active disease may benefit most.
Section scientifique
Granulocyte adsorptive apheresis for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis
Takeshi Tomomasa 1, Akio Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kaneko, Sasaki Mika, Shun-Ichi Maisawa, Yoshie Chino, Hohkibara Syou, Atsushi Yoden, Jyunko Fujino, Makoto Tanikawa, Takafumi Yamashita, Shigeru Kimura, Maiko Kanoh, Koji Sawada, Akihiro Morikawa
Granulocytapheresis (GCAP) has produced efficacy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) by adsorbing activated granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of GCAP in pediatric patients with active UC. Twelve steroid-refractory children (12.2 +/- 3.1 years old) were treated with GCAP, one session/week for 5-10 consecutive weeks. In 8 patients, clinical symptoms improved after two GCAP sessions. Normal body temperature, stool frequency, and disappearance of blood in stool were seen after 24.3 +/- 11.5 days. The endoscopic grade improved from 2.6 +/- 0.3 to 0.4 +/- 0.2. One patient who initially responded, developed bloody diarrhea later and 2 cases remained unchanged. The dose of steroid was tapered during GCAP therapy by 50%. No serious adverse effects were noted. Four of 8 cases relapsed 3.5 +/- 2.2 months after the last GCAP while on maintenance therapy, the other 4 were in remission up to 22.8 +/- 18.1 months. In conclusion, GCAP appears to be effective and well tolerated in children with steroid-refractory UC.
Section scientifique
The present status and the recent development of the treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases: desirable effect of extracorporeal immunomodulation
Masakazu Takazoe 1, Torao Tanaka, Kenji Kondo, Toshiki Ichimori, Toshio Shinoda Ther Apher 2002 Aug;6(4):305-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2002.00445.x.
The immunological and genetic pathogeneses of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been well elucidated in the recent years. The pharmacologic treatment of IBDs accordingly becomes to focus upon the individual pathologic step (targeting therapy), whereas the therapeutic action is not yet a pinpoint one. It has been known recently that new drugs such as biological immunomodulating agents and anti-inflammatory cytokines have better short-term effects in some respects than the conventional drugs, and they might alter the treatment strategy of IBDs in the near future. The limitation of pharmacologic treatments mainly results from adverse effects of the drugs, i.e. infection susceptibility, oncogenesis, teratogenesis and so forth. The extracorporeal therapy such as leukocytapheresis and photopheresis is reportedly effective for IBDs probably through immunomodulation such as decrease in circulating activated T-lymphocytes and activated granulocytes that play a central role in the pathogenesis of IBD. It can be said that these extracorporeal treatment methods have advantage of rapid action and lack of serious adverse effects to drug therapy.
Contactez-nousPour en savoir plus
Contactez-nous