Evidencia científica

Evaluation of Neutrophil Activity Before and After Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis in Patients With Pustular Psoriasis

Yuko Higashi 1 2Atsuko Ibusuki 1Tomoko Fukushige 1Ryoko Sagara 1Risako Yonezawa 1Natsumi Terada 1Hisao Kawahira 1Kimiko Kazumura 3Takuro Kanekura 1

Ther Apher Dial. 2025 Aug;29(4):702-706. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.70043. Epub 2025 May 25.

Introduction: Activated neutrophils play a crucial role in the development of neutrophilic dermatoses, including pustular psoriasis. Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) is an effective treatment for skin disorders. Although previous basic research has demonstrated neutrophil activation, no efficient method exists to assess it in clinical settings.

Methods: We measured neutrophil activity in patients with GPP who underwent GMA therapy using the FLP-H4200, a newly developed neutrophil activity evaluation system. Blood samples were collected before the first and after the fifth GMA session.

Results: In Case 1, which responded to GMA, the neutrophil activation value decreased from 118 603 to 26 234, reaching the normal range. In Case 2, the response to GMA was poor, and the neutrophil activation value decreased from 140 623 to 76 780, which remained significantly above the normal level.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the neutrophil activity evaluation system may be useful for assessing disease severity and therapeutic efficacy.

Evidencia científica

Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on the management of generalized pustular psoriasis

Siew Eng Choon 1Peter Anthony Foley 2 3Pravit Asawanonda 4Hideki Fujita 5Seong-Jin Jo 6Yu-Ling Shi 7 8Colin Theng 9Azura Mohd Affandi 10Chul Hwan Bang 11Maria Lorna Frez 12Huang Yu Huei 13 14Doanh Le Huu 15Tae-Gyun Kim 16Akimichi Morita 17Hazel H Oon 18 19Pablo Fernández-Peñas 20 21Natta Rajatanavin 22Suganthy Robinson 10Latha Selvarajah 23Tsen-Fang Tsai 24

J Dermatol. 2024 Dec;51(12):1579-1595. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17471. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, heterogeneous, and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by primary, sterile, and macroscopically visible pustules with or without systemic symptoms. There are ethnic differences in the genetic mutations associated with GPP that might affect the clinical manifestations and treatment responses. Currently, there is limited evidence from the patient population in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, resulting in a general paucity of information on the effective management of patients with GPP in this region. This modified Delphi panel study aimed to identify current evidence and gain advanced insights to facilitate the development of a regionally tailored APAC consensus on the management of GPP. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify published literature and develop consensus statements on (i) definition and clinical course, (ii) diagnosis of GPP, (iii) treatment outcomes, goals, and monitoring measures, and (iv) optimal management strategies and clinical practices. Statements were rated by a panel of dermatologists in two rounds, with the threshold for consensus at ≥80% agreement. Twenty experts from the APAC region reached consensus on 106 statements that were developed based on the SLR and experts’ collective expertise. The experts agreed that GPP is a rare, severe, and potentially life-threatening condition that is distinct from plaque psoriasis. This consensus emphasized the importance of a tailored treatment strategy taking into account the GPP flare severity and each patient’s unique clinical circumstances. The experts reached consensus on the severity classification of GPP flares and recommended first-line and maintenance treatment options for adult GPP, childhood GPP, and GPP in pregnancy. These consensus outcomes have been synthesized into treatment algorithms to guide dermatologists in the APAC region in their clinical decision-making processes.

Non-pharmacological treatments, such as GMA and IVIG, can be considered based on their availability in individual countries

Evidencia científica

Pustular psoriasis: A distinct aetiopathogenic and clinical entity

Biju Vasudevan 1Pankaj Das 1Siddharth Bhatt 1 Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 May 28:1-11.

Pustular psoriasis is a distinct subset of psoriasis that presents with involvement of the skin in the form of sterile pustules along with systemic manifestations. Though it has been conventionally grouped under the umbrella of psoriasis, recent research has shed light on its pathogenetic mechanisms associated with the IL-36 pathway, which is distinct from conventional psoriasis. Pustular psoriasis in itself is a heterogeneous entity consisting of various subtypes, including generalized, localized, acute, and chronic forms. There is confusion regarding its current classification as entities like deficiency of IL-36 antagonist (DITRA) which are closely related to pustular psoriasis both in their pathogenetic mechanism and its clinical manifestations, are not included under pustular psoriasis. Entities like palmoplantar pustulosis, which presents with similar clinical features but is pathogenetically distinct from other forms of pustular psoriasis, are included under this condition. Management of pustular psoriasis depends upon its severity; while some of the localized variants can be managed with topical therapy alone, the generalized variants like Von Zumbusch disease and impetigo herpetiformis may need intensive care unit admission and tailor-made treatment protocols. The advent of newer biologics and better insight into the pathogenesis of pustular psoriasis has opened the way for newer therapies, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, interleukin-17 inhibitors, and granulocyte monocyte apheresis. It continues to be an enigma whether pustular psoriasis is actually a variant of psoriasis or an entirely different disease entity, though we feel that it is an entirely different disease process.

Pustular psoriasis: A distinct aetiopathogenic and clinical entity – PubMed (nih.gov)

Pustular psoriasis: A distinct aetiopathogenic and clinical entity – Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology (ijdvl.com)

Evidencia científica

SA6-03 MicroRNA and granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis on neutrophilic skin diseases

Yuko Higashi, Munekazu Yamakuchi, Takuro Kanekura

poster at ISFA 2019 pag 126

Neutrophilic skin diseases are a group of disorders characterized by intense dermal infiltration of neutrophils without infection. They include a variety of diseases, such as pyoderma gangrenosum, pustular psoriasis, and palmoplantar pustulosis. We demonstrated that granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis (GMA) is a useful treatment modality for such refractory skin diseases. Microarray analysis of microRNAs (miRNAs) was performed using sera of patients with neutrophilic skin diseases before and after GMA. Several miRNAs significantly increased in patients compared to control subjects. The expression of three
miRNAs decreased after apheresis, suggesting that these miRNAs might be involved in the pathogenesis of neutrophilic skin decreases. To prove the function of these miRNAs, HL-60, a human acute promyelocytic leukemia cell line, was differentiated by the treatment of alltrans retinoic acid (ATRA). When HL-60 was differentiated to neutrophilic cells, the HEstaining shows an increased cytoplasm to nucleus ratio, condensated chromatin, and nuclear segmentation. The expression of three miRNAs increased during the neutrophilic differentiation. Stimulation of ATRA-treated HL-60 by some cytokines altered miRNA expressions. Moreover, manipulation of these miRNAs changed proliferation of cultured keratinocytes. These data
suggest that miRNAs play an important role in regulating neutrophilic differentiation and proliferation of keratinocytes in case of neutrophilic disorders such as psoriasis. These miRNAs could be markers of disease severity and response of GMA.

http://www.atalacia.com/isfa/data/abstract.pdf

Evidencia científica

Granulo-monocyto apheresis is more effective in mild ulcerative colitis than in moderate to severe disease.

Chiara De Cassan 1Edoardo Savarino 1Piero Marson 1Tiziana Tison 1Giorgia Hatem 1Giacomo Carlo Sturniolo 1Renata D’Incà 1 , World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17155-62.

Patients with mild UC benefit from GMA more than patients with moderate to severe disease in the short-term period. GMA should be considered a valid therapeutic option in cases of contraindications to immunosuppressants, corticosteroids and/or biologics.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25493030/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258586/pdf/WJG-20-17155.pdf

ContáctanosPara solicitar información adicional

Contáctanos