Masaki Kato ¹, Masaki Yamashita ¹, Shigeki Kojima ², Mitsuto Tsukui ¹, Yoshihiko Iijima ¹, Kenichi Araki ¹, Jun Ishida ¹, Takumi Komatsu ¹, Yusuke Nakamoto ¹, Akiyo Kawashima ¹, Maki Konno ¹, Hirofumi Kiyokawa ¹, Yoshinori Sato ¹, Tsutomu Sakurada ², Tadateru Maehata ¹, Hiroshi Yasuda ¹, Keisuke Tateishi ¹

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43389. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043389.

5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) intolerance complicates ulcerative colitis (UC) management, often necessitating alternative treatment approaches. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) has been recognized as a safe treatment option for patients with UC who are refractory or intolerant to conventional drugs, including steroids; however, its effectiveness and safety in patients with 5-ASA intolerance remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GMA in patients with UC and 5-ASA intolerance. Eighty-five patients with UC who underwent GMA were assessed, including 21 with 5-ASA intolerance and 64 with 5-ASA tolerance. This study compared the patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, concomitant drugs, and adverse events between the 2 groups. The remission rate was 28.6% (6/21) in the 5-ASA-intolerant group and 31.3% (20/64) in the 5-ASA-tolerant group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .967). Both groups showed significant reductions in the dose of oral prednisolone and Lichtiger clinical activity index scores following the GMA. Our study suggests that GMA is equally effective and safe in 5-ASA-intolerant and 5-ASA-tolerant patients, offering an alternative treatment option in this challenging clinical scenario.

Johannes Hasskamp ¹, Christian Meinhardt ², Petrease H Patton ³, Antje Timmer ¹

Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD000478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000478.pub5.

Background: Maintenance of remission is essential in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in terms of disease course and long-term prognosis. The thiopurines azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have longstanding merit in ulcerative colitis, but more therapeutic options have been developed. This review is an update and extension of a review last published in 2016.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in monotherapy or combined therapy regimens compared to placebo or active controls for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

Search methods: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (until May 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov (until May 2023), Embase (until August 2022), MEDLINE (until May 2023), and WHO ICTRP (until May 2023). We checked reference lists of the included studies and, if needed, contacted the authors to request more data or information.

Main results: We included 10 studies in the review, including 468 adult participants with ulcerative colitis. The risk of bias across these was low for most outcomes, but we considered some outcomes to have some concerns or high risk of bias due to insufficient information on concealment of allocation and outcome measurement. Based on five placebo-controlled studies, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine may reduce the risk of failing to maintain remission. In the thiopurine group, 45% (64/143) of participants failed to maintain remission compared to 67% (96/143) of participants receiving placebo (RR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.82; 5 studies, 286 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three studies reported withdrawals due to adverse events. Among participants on azathioprine, 4% (3/80) withdrew due to adverse events compared to 0% (0/82) of placebo participants (RD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.09; 3 studies, 162 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is of low certainty when comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate. Based on one three-armed trial, 27% (3/11) of 6-mercaptopurine participants failed to maintain remission compared to 100% (2/2) of 5-aminosalicylate participants (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.97; 1 study, 13 participants; low-certainty evidence). This trial also involved an induction phase; we only included the results for participants in remission. The single trial comparing 6-mercaptopurine to 5-aminosalicylate did not report separate data on adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events for the subgroup with successful induction of remission, so we could not analyze these outcomes for this comparison.

Authors’ conclusions: Low-certainty evidence suggests that azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy may be more effective than placebo for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. More research is needed to evaluate the value of therapeutic drug monitoring and the effects of various treatment modalities on long-term safety.

Tomotaka Tanaka ¹, Daiki Hirano ¹, Syohei Ishimaru ¹, Keiko Arataki ¹

Cureus 2025 Jan 18;17(1):e77641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77641. eCollection 2025 Jan.

We report the case of a 37-year-old male patient diagnosed with moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC). Initial therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was terminated within days due to exacerbation of symptoms, leading to a diagnosis of 5-ASA intolerance. Although induction of remission was achieved with prednisolone, the patient developed steroid dependency. Treatment with vedolizumab and ustekinumab subsequently failed to achieve clinical or endoscopic improvement. Intensive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) was introduced, successfully inducing remission. However, during maintenance therapy with GMA, the patient experienced a relapse. Initiation of golimumab yielded suboptimal results, necessitating a combination therapy involving prednisolone and reintensified intensive GMA. This multimodal approach successfully achieved remission induction and maintenance. This case highlights the potential utility of intensive GMA in combination with golimumab and prednisolone for the management of refractory UC, particularly in patients with 5-ASA intolerance and failure of multiple biologic agents. A brief review of the relevant literature is included.

Sneha Annie Sebastian ¹, Oroshay Kaiwan ², Edzel L Co ³, Meghana Mehendale ⁴, Babu P Mohan

Spartan Med Res J. 2024 Sep 9;9(3):123397. doi: 10.51894/001c.123397. eCollection 2024.

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD) with periods of relapse and remission. Current advancements in clinical research have led to the development of more refined and effective medical therapy for UC.

Summary of the evidence: Traditional therapeutic agents such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), sulfasalazine (SASP), corticosteroids, and immunomodulatory drugs have remained the gold standard for decades. However, their novel formulations and dosage regimens have changed their sequences in the medical management of UC. Several other novel drugs are in the final phases of clinical development or have recently received regulatory approval designed to target specific mechanisms involved in the inflammatory cascade for UC.

GMA has shown its efficacy in mild to moderate UC and refractory UC (steroid-dependent UC or biologic/immunologic resistant UC or lost their response to biologics) for remission induction.

Conclusions: This narrative review sought to provide a comprehensive knowledge of the potential benefits of standard and emerging therapies, including novel formulations, new chemical entities, and novel therapeutic approaches in managing UC. Keywords: Ulcerative colitis, 5- Aminosalicylic acid, sulfasalazine, corticosteroids, biologics, immunomodulators, novel formulations.

Nobuhiro Ueno ¹, Yuya Sugiyama ¹, Yu Kobayashi ¹, Yuki Murakami ¹, Takuya Iwama ², Takahiro Sasaki ¹, Takehito Kunogi ¹, Aki Sakatani ¹, Keitaro Takahashi ¹, Kazuyuki Tanaka ³, Shinya Serikawa ⁴, Katsuyoshi Ando ¹, Shin Kashima ¹, Momotaro Muto ⁵, Yuhei Inaba ², Kentaro Moriichi ¹, Hiroki Tanabe ¹, Toshikatsu Okumura ¹, Mikihiro Fujiya

J Clin Apher.  2023 Jan 13. doi: 10.1002/jca.22040.

Background: Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with Adacolumn has been used as a remission induction therapy for patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). Herein, we investigated the influence of concomitant medications in the remission induction of GMA in patients with active UC. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with UC underwent GMA in five independent institutions in Japan from January 2011 to July 2021. Factors including concomitant medications associated with clinical remission (CR) were analyzed statistically. Result: A total of 133 patients were included. Seventy-four patients achieved a CR after GMA. The multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant medication with 5-aminosalicylic acid, Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), and concomitant medication with immunosuppressors (IMs) remained as predictors of CR after GMA. In the subgroup analysis in patients with MES of 2, concomitant medication with IMs was demonstrated as a significant negative factor of CR after GMA (P = .042, OR 0.354). Seventy-four patients who achieved CR after GMA were followed up for 52 weeks. In the multivariable analysis, the maintenance therapy with IMs was demonstrated as a significant positive factor of sustained CR up to 52 weeks (P = .038, OR 2.214). Furthermore, the rate of sustained CR in patients with biologics and IMs was significantly higher than that in patients with biologics only (P = .002). Conclusion: GMA was more effective for patients with active UC that relapsed under treatment without IMs. Furthermore, the addition of IMs should be considered in patients on maintenance therapy with biologics after GMA.

Concomitant pharmacologic medications influence the clinical outcomes of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study – PubMed (nih.gov)