Kyoya Sakimura · Toshihide Omori · Etsuro Iwashita ·Takeshi Yoshida · Yoshikazu Tsuzuki · Kenji Fujimori ·Fumio Konishi · Yukio Yoshida · Hiroo Anzai ·Hiromichi Suzuki · Souichi Sugawara · Yuji Takeda ·Katsuya Hiraishi · Abbi R. Saniabadi · Tatsuo Ide ·Soichiro Miura · Shinichi Ota

Dig Dis Sci 2006 Sep;51(9):1525-31. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-9012-1. Epub 2006 Aug 12.

Depletion of granulocytes and monocytes (GM) by selective apheresis (GMA) with an Adacolumn exerts
an anti-inflammatory effect in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or rheumatoid arthritis. However, the mechanism of the
anti-inflammatory effect of GMA is not fully understood yet. We investigated the effect of GMA on the plasma concentration of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine. Twenty-six patients with active UC received GMA at one session per week for 5 consecutive weeks. Clinical response was defined as
clinical activity index (
CAI = CAI at entry – CAI at post) ≥ 4, while clinical remission was defined as CAI ≤ 4. Twenty-one of twenty-six patients (80.8%) responded to GMA. In the first session, plasma from responder patients showed a significant (P < 0.01) increase in IL-1ra in the Adacolumn outflow. In contrast, there was no change in IL-1ra in nonresponders. In conclusion, release of IL-1ra during GMA might be one mechanism of clinical efficacy associated with this therapy.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16902810/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10620-005-9012-1

Alvaro A Pineda ¹ , Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006 Jan;12 Suppl 1:S10-4.

Initially used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, nonselective therapeutic leukocytapheresis was applied to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as early as the 1980s. Since then, the process has been further refined and 2 blood perfusion systems using membrane filtration are presently employed in Japan and Europe for the selective removal of leukocytes in patients with IBD: Cellsorba is a column of polyethylenephtarate fibers that captures lymphocytes and granulocytes, and Adacolumn is a column of cellulose acetate beads that selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes. These systems overcome the limitations of centrifugation. Leukocytapheresis has been shown to exert an overall anti-inflammatory effect, as peripheral leukocytes demonstrated a diminished capacity to produce inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1beta. In addition, down-regulation in the expression of adhesion molecule L-selectin and a shift toward a more immature granulocyte phenotype were observed in the peripheral blood. The safety and beneficial therapeutic effect of leukocytapheresis in IBD are being investigated further.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16378005/

Takayuki Yamamoto, Satoru Umegae, Koichi Matsumoto February 2006 World Journal of Gastroenterology 12(4):520-5 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v12.i4.520

Active ulcerative colitis (UC) is frequently associated with infiltration of a large number of leukocytes into the bowel mucosa. Therefore, removal of activated circulating leukocytes by apheresis has the potential for improving UC. In Japan, since April 2000, leukocytapheresis using Adacolumn has been approved as the treatment for active UC by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Adacolumn is an extracorporeal leukocyte apheresis device filled with cellulose acetate beads, and selectively adsorbs granulocytes and monocytes / macrophages. To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMCAP) for UC, we reviewed 10 open trials of the use of GMCAP to treat UC. One apheresis session (session time, 60 min) per week for five consecutive weeks (a total of five apheresis sessions) has been a standard protocol. Several studies used modified protocols with two sessions per week, with 90-min session, or with a total of 10 apheresis sessions. Typical adverse reactions were dizziness, nausea, headache, flushing, and fever. No serious adverse effects were reported during and after GMCAP therapy, and almost all the patients could complete the treatment course. GMCAP is safe and well-tolerated. In the majority of patients, GMCAP therapy achieved clinical remission or improvement. GMCAP is a useful alternative therapy for patients with steroid-refractory or -dependent UC. GMCAP should have the potential to allow tapering the dose of steroids, and is useful for shortening the time to remission and avoiding re-administration of steroids at the time of relapse. Furthermore, GMCAP may have efficacy as the first-line therapy for steroid-naive patients or patients who have the first attack of UC. However, most of the previous studies were uncontrolled trials. To assess a definite efficacy of GMCAP, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trials are necessary. A serious problem with GMCAP is cost; a single session costs ¥145 000 ($1 300). However, if this treatment prevents hospital admission, re-administration of steroids and surgery, and improves a quality of life of the patients, GMCAP may prove to be cost-effective.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7286897_Safety_and_clinical_efficacy_of_granulocyte_and_monocyte_adsorptive_apheresis_therapy_for_ulcerative_colitis

R Sanmartí ¹, S Marsal, J Valverde, E Casado, R Lafuente, N Kashiwagi, J-R Rodriguez-Cros, A Erra, D Reina, J Gratacós Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005 Sep;44(9):1140-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh701. Epub 2005 May 31.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GCAP) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients with active and refractory RA were treated with weekly GCAP sessions using a column filled with acetate beads (Adacolumn) over five consecutive weeks. Clinical assessments and response to therapy were analysed at weeks 5, 7, 12 and 20 in an open multicentre trial. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 20. EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response criteria, based on the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) and disability using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), were also assessed. Results: Of 27 patients, 81.5% were women with mean disease duration of 14.4 yr. The mean number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was 3.7, and 48.1% of patients had previously failed on biologicals. On an intention-to-treat basis, 40.7% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 44.4% a therapeutic EULAR response at week 20. These percentages were 50 and 54.5% in 22 patients who completed the trial. In the 10 completers who had previously failed on biologicals, an ACR response was achieved in four patients (ACR20, two; ACR50, one; ACR70, one). A significant decrease was recorded in different ACR response components, including the tender joint and swollen joint counts, pain score and patient and physician global disease assessments, as well as the DAS28 index; most of them improved after week 5. ESR and CRP, but not the HAQ score, had decreased significantly at week 20. The treatment was well tolerated and only one serious adverse event related to the study procedure was documented (sepsis due to a catheter infection). Conclusions: GCAP treatment led to significant clinical improvement in a subset of patients with RA who had failed to respond to DMARDs or biologicals. Further large, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to fully assess the therapeutic value of GCAP for refractory RA.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15927997/

https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/44/9/1140/1784472?login=false

Ritsuko Yanaru-Fujisawa, Takayuki Matsumoto, Shotaro Nakamura, Shuji Kochi, Mitsuo Iida, Futoshi Kohda, Minako Hirahashi, Takashi Yao, Ryuichi Case Reports Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005 Aug;11(8):780 DOI: 10.1097/01.mib.0000172558.39767.b7

Our case and the case of Kanekura et al⁸ suggest that circulating leukocytes may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PG and that GCAP in combination with corticosteroids may be a promising strategy for intractable PG. Furthermore, as has been the case for active UC, GCAP may be a choice for severe pouchitis. An accumulation of data with respect to the effect of GCAP on pouchitis seems to be warranted.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16043996/

https://academic.oup.com/ibdjournal/article/11/8/780/4685895

TAKAFUMI ANDO, OSAMU WATANABE, RYUICHI FURUTA, OSAMU MAEDA, YUJI NISHIO,
TSUYOSHI NISHIWAKI, KENJI INA, KAZUO KUSUGAMI AND HIDEMI GOTO Digestive Endoscopy (2005) 17, 153–158

Introduction: Despite decades of clinical experience in optimizing the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), some patients remain refractory to conventional medical treatment while, in others, the effectiveness of drugs is limited by side-effects. We investigated factors predictive of the efficacy of cyclosporine and leukocyte removal therapy in patients with intractable UC. Methods: Forty-five patients with moderate to severe UC who were refractory to corticosteroid therapy were enrolled. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclosporine and 19 by leukocyte removal therapy. Disease activity index (DAI) score assessment, and colonoscopic and histological examinations were done before and at 10, 20 and 40 days after the initiation of treatment. A clinical response to treatment was defined as a decrease in DAI score of 3 points or more at 40 days. Results: Responder ratio did not significantly differ between the cyclosporine (65.6%) and leukocyte removal therapy (63.2%) groups. Factors predictive of a response to cyclosporine therapy were fever (≥ 38.0∞C), anemia and large mucosal ulceration. In contrast, mucosal bleeding and poor extensibility of the intestinal lumen were predictive of a poor response to cyclosporine. No significant differences in any clinical or endoscopic parameter predictive of a response to leukocyte removal therapy were identified. Conclusions: Intravenous cyclosporine may be effective in patients who have severe steroid-refractory UC, and leukocyte removal therapy may be useful in patients with moderate active UC predicted to be refractive to cyclosporine.

Koji Sawada ¹, Akimitsu Egashira, Kunio Ohnishi, Ken Fukunaga, Takeshi Kusaka, Takashi Shimoyama

Dig Dis Sci 2005 Apr;50(4):767-73. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2571-3.

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a method of therapeutic apheresis to remove patients’ peripheral leukocytes by extracorporeal circulation. Previous studies showed that LCAP for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) was more effective and had fewer adverse effects compared to high-dose steroid therapy. However, there are no reports on the application of LCAP for UC patients with toxic megacolon (TM). This study reports the effectiveness and safety of LCAP in treating patients with severe or fulminant UC with TM. Six patients were enrolled in this study and LCAP sessions were performed three times per week for 2 weeks, followed by four further times in the next 4 weeks. After completion of therapy, four patients improved in TM and went into the remission stage of UC. The average Rachmilewitz clinical activity index of these four patients improved from 19.5 to 1. The remaining two patients had to undergo colectomy, however, the symptoms had been mitigated by LCAP and the operations were completed without any problems. These results suggest that LCAP is an additional effective and safe option for TM management in preventing colectomy or for bridging to a safer operation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15844716/

Russell D. Cohen

Gastroenterology2005 Vol. 128; Iss. 1 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.024

Clinical response rates in uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease studies have commonly run in the 30%–50% range; as a result, early uncontrolled trials need validation from adequately blinded randomized trials before widespread application of such novel therapies. Although the long-term maintenance data from this study (60% at 8 months) is encouraging, further studies of the optimal interval for repeating apheresis for reinduction of remission or maintenance arealso in order. The potential for apheresis-based therapies as either a stand-alone strategy or in combination with other proven therapies in
the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases also needs to be further elucidated. The promise of “no medications” for effective therapy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is enticing, and perhaps a step closer, but clearly needs to be substantiated by larger controlled trials.

https://booksc.eu/book/20696837/914ad3

[Article in Korean ]Hyo Jong Kim ¹, Joo Sung Kim, Dong Soo Han, Suk-Kyun Yang, Ki Baik Hahm, Woo In Lee, Seog-Woon Kwon, Jai Hyun Choi, Won Ho Kim, Kyu Yong Choi, In Sung Song Korean J Gastroenterol  2005 Jan;45(1):34-44. PMID: 15665566

Background/aims: In chronic inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis (UC), the migration of granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages from the circulation into the colonic mucosa is especially important in maintaining inflammation. The aim of this trial was to assess safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with moderate-to-severe UC refractory to conventional drug therapies. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with moderate (55.6%) to severe (44.4%) active UC refractory to conventional drug therapies who had no changes in their conventional therapy regimen in the past two weeks before the recruitment were enrolled in an open-label trial. Concomitant medications were allowed, and steroids were tapered down according to the clinical activity during the course. We used an adsorptive type extracorporeal column (Adacolumn; JIMRO, Takasaki, Japan), which selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes. Patients took five apheresis sessions, each with 60 minutes duration for 5 consecutive weeks. The primary efficacy variables were clinical disease activity, short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ), C-reactive protein (CRP), and endoscopic scores. These variables were scored at regular intervals, and analyzed at week 7 on an intention-to-treat (ITT) principles. Results: At 7 weeks, 70.4% of patients showed overall improvement. Clinical disease activity (p < 0.0001), endoscopic score (p < 0.001), and the quality of life as assessed by SIBDQ (p < 0.0001) were significantly improved after the therapy. In 56.3% of concomitant steroid users, tapering down or discontinuation of steroids was possible. Treatment was well tolerated, and no severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Adacolumn was very efficacious in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC refractory to conventional drug therapy, but further assessment is needed.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15665566/

Takeshi Kusaka ¹, Ken Fukunaga, Kunio Ohnishi, Tadashi Kosaka, Toshihiko Tomita, Yoko Yokoyama, Koji Sawada, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Hiroto Miwa, Takayuki Matsumoto

J Clin Apher. 2004;19(4):168-73. doi: 10.1002/jca.20023.

Six patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) unresponsive to conventional medications (CM) were treated with Monocyte-granulocytapheresis (M-GCAP). CD patients who scored 200-400 points in Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) in spite of receiving CM, including enteral nutrition, for at least 2 weeks were enrolled in our double series trial. Each series had 5 weekly M-GCAP and 2 follow-up weeks, and each M-GCAP treated 1,800 ml of patient’s peripheral blood. After the 1st series, patients who decreased more than 50 points on the CDAI were deemed responders and enrolled in the second series. Patients with a CDAI score less than 150 points were considered in remission. The patients’ quality of life was evaluated using an index (IBDQ) before and after the 1st series. The CDAI was significantly decreased comparing before and after the 1st series (258.2 +/- 36.2 vs. 166.5 +/- 16.6; P < 0.02). 50% of patients (3/6) responded to the therapy, and one case (16.7%) could be induced to remission. Significant removal was revealed only for white blood cells (25.6 +/- 16.9%; P < 0.05), especially granulocytes (29.5 +/- 22.5%; P < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement of IBDQ was revealed in the responders’ group (162.3 +/- 17.2 vs. 189.3 +/- 11.5; P < 0.03). M-GCAP could be an effective adjunctive therapy for active CD patients unresponsive to CM allowing them to maintain a high QOL. However, it might be difficult to improve patients who could not be induced to remission after the 1st series by applying another series.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15597346/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.20023